COMBINED ANTERIOR FUSION FOR CERVICAL SPINE INJURY
https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2006.3.24-28
Abstract
Objective. Substantiation of combined fixation utilizing anterior cervical plates and porous implants for unstable cervical spine injury.
Material and Methods. Sixty-five patients (mean age of 31.3 years) were operated on for complicated and noncomplicated cervical spine injuries. Out of them there were 53 (81.5 %) men and 12 (18.5 %) women. Patients were grouped according to mechanisms of injury and terms of admission to the hospital. Isolated interbody fusion or combined fusion with anterior plate was performed depending on the degree of instability. Outcome assessment included a dynamics of neurologic regression, reconstruction of a spine axis (according to X-ray and CT data), and in some cases the spinal cord was assessed with CT and MRI.
Results. Complete spinal cord injury resulted in death of 5 patients despite complete decompression and rigid fixation of the injured segment, at discharge 14 patients had neurologic status of type A (ASIA scale), and 4 patients moved to type B. Patients with incomplete spinal cord injury demonstrated the following outcomes: in group of patients with type B neurologic deterioration 4 patients improved to type C and 2 – to type D; in type C group 5 patients improved to type D and 5 – to type E; in type D group 5 patients improved to type E.
Conclusion. Combination of interbody fusion with anterior plate fixation significantly augments the reliability of fixation, permitting to avoid external immobilization and to activate patients earlier, which finally improves neurologic prognosis and provides favorable conditions for bone-metal block formation.
About the Authors
Andrey Nikolayevich MatveyevRussian Federation
Dmitry Leonidovich Glukhikh
Russian Federation
References
1. Басков А.В., Гринь А.А. Яриков Д.Е. Хирургическое лечение при травме шейного отдела позвоночника // Нейрохирургия. 2003. № 1. С. 6–13.
2. Коновалов А.Н., Лихтерман Л.Б., Потапов А.А. Нейротравматология. М., 1994.
3. Сабуренко Ю.Ф., Перфильев С.В., Кариев М.Х. Анализ лечения осложненных повреждений шейного отдела позвоночника // Симпозиум, посвященный 70-летию Новокузнецкого ГИДУВА: Сб. науч. тр. Новосибирск, 1997. С. 115–118.
4. Учуров О.Н., Яриков Д.Е., Басков А.В. Возможности использования классификации ASIA/IMSOP для оценки динамики неврологической симптоматики у больных с травматическим поражением шейного отдела спинного мозга // Нейрохирургия. 2003. № 1. С. 43–43.
5. Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries // Spine. 1983. Vol. 8. P. 817–831.
6. Meyer P.R. Cervical spine fractures. Changing management concepts // In: Bridwell K.H., De Wald R.L., eds. The textbook of spinal surgery. Philadelphia, 1997. P. 1679–1741.
Review
For citations:
Matveyev A.N., Glukhikh D.L. COMBINED ANTERIOR FUSION FOR CERVICAL SPINE INJURY. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2006;(3):024-028. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2006.3.24-28