DIAGNOSTICS OF SPINAL SCOLIOTIC DEFORMITIES BY BIOMECHANICAL PARAMETERS
https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2006.3.71-75
Abstract
Objective. To substantiate the efficacy of scoliotic deformity diagnosis by quantitative parameters.
Methods. The examination is performed with spine scanner. The spine is assessed separately in each plane: frontal, sagittal and horizontal. Each parameter is evaluated in automatic mode with developed program and a code is assigned to it depending on its magnitude.
Results. Basing on data received by spine scanning the criteria for estimation of various pathologic conditions in spine scoliosis using biomechanical parameters were developed. Formalized signs of scoliotic deformities in three planes are defined with corresponding diagnostic codes necessary for detection of scoliotic deformity type. Both an existing scheme of orthopaedic examination and parameters received at scanning of scoliotic spine are reported.
Conclusion. The advantage of spine scanning over clinical and radiological techniques consists in assessment of a shape and a spatial orientation of the spine by several quantitative parameters without radiography, and in ability to formulate diagnosis within several minutes.
About the Authors
Albert Leonidovich Khanaev
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksandr Vjacheslavovich Gladkov
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Evgeny Arkadyevich Cherepanov
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Гладков А.В., Ханаев А.Л. Оценка результатов коррекции сколиотической деформации // Адаптация различных систем организма при сколиотической деформации позвоночника: Методы лечения: Тез. докл. Междунар. симпозиума. Москва, 2003. С. 17–18.
2. Гладков А.В., Пронских И.В. Геометрия позвоночного столба: Актуальные вопросы вертебрологии. Л., 1988.
3. Михайловский М.В., Фомичев Н.Г. Хирургия деформаций позвоночника. Новосибирск, 2002.
4. Мовшович И.А., Риц И.А. Рентгенодиагностика и принципы лечения сколиоза. М., 1969.
5. Титаренко Я.С., Черепанов Е.А. Оценка формы позвоночника с использованием комплекса «Сканер позвоночника»: Нормативная база // I Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. молодых ученых по вертебрологии и смежным дисциплинам: Тез. докл. Новосибирск, 2005. С. 7.
6. Castro W.H., Sautmann A., Schilgen M., et al. Noninvasive three-dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion in normal subjects in relation to age and sex. An experimental examination // Spine. 2000. Vol. 25. P. 443–449.
7. Ovadia D., Fragniere B., Dickman D., et al. A new approach for scoliosis assessment preliminary results // EuroSpine-2002. Abstracts of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Spine Society of Europe. Nantes, 2002. P. 114.
8. Mannion A.F., Knecht K., Balaban G., et al. A new skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: reliability of measurements and comparison with date reviewed from the literature // Eur. Spine J. 2004. Vol. 13. P. 122–136.
9. Morrissy R.T., Goldsmith G.S., Hall E.C., et al. Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1990. Vol. 72. P. 320–327.
Review
For citations:
Khanaev A.L., Gladkov A.V., Cherepanov E.A. DIAGNOSTICS OF SPINAL SCOLIOTIC DEFORMITIES BY BIOMECHANICAL PARAMETERS. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2006;(3):071-075. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2006.3.71-75
Email this article 