CHANGES IN PLASTIC ANATOMY OF THE TRUNK IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE PROGRESSIVE SCOLIOSIS
https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2008.4.13-19
Abstract
Objective. To study plastic anatomy in patients with severe scoliotic curvature of the spine. Materials and Methods. A total of 731 patients with idiopathic scoliosis were examined. All patients at initial examination at the age of 4 to 20 years were diagnosed with grade IV deformity of the spine. Examination included clinical and X- ray methods with the assessment of limb-to-trunk length proportions according to plastic anatomy canons. Results. Progressive spinal deformities are associated with disorders in proportions between anatomic parts of the trunk. The revealed process of changes in plastic anatomy has been termed a “scoliotic disproportion syndrome”. This process is divided into four severity stages depending on the magnitude of the spinal deformity. These stages reflect a progression of the disease severity. Conclusion. The presented scoliotic disproportion syndrome and stages of its development can be useful as additional diagnostic information in determining the nature of scoliotic deformity and prediction of probable development of the pathology.
About the Authors
Dmitry Kimovich Tesakov
Republican Scientific and Practical Centre for Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Minsk, Belarus
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Darya Dmitryevna Tesakova
Belarusian State Medical University, Minsk
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Деформации позвоночника / Под ред. В.М. Шаповалова и др. СПб., 2000.
2. Казьмин А.И., Кон И.И., Беленький В.Е. Сколиоз. М., 1981.
3. Маркс В.О. Ортопедическая диагностика. Минск, 1978.
4. Михайловский М.В. Основные принципы хирургической коррекции идиопатического сколиоза // Актуальные вопросы детской травматологии и ортопедии: Тез. докл. науч.-практ. конф. детских травматологов-ортопедов России. СПб., 2005. С. 126–134.
5. Михайловский М.В., Фомичев Н.Г. Хирургия деформаций позвоночника. Новосибирск, 2002.
6. Мовшович И.А. Сколиоз: Хирургическая анатомия и патогенез. М., 1964.
7. Павлов Г.Г., Павлова В.Н., Павлов Г.М. Пластическая анатомия. М., 2000.
8. Садофьева В.И. Нормальная рентгеноанатомия костно-суставной системы детей. Л., 1990.
9. Тесаков Д.К., Тесакова Д.Д., Макаревич С.В. Рентгенологическая трехплоскостная оценка деформации позвоночника при сколиозе // Ортопед., травматол. и протезир. 2007. № 3. С. 81–87.
10. Ульрих Э.В., Мушкин А.Ю. Вертебрология в терминах, цифрах, рисунках. СПб., 2002.
11. Фищенко В.Я. Сколиоз. Макеевка, 2005.
12. Цивьян Я.Л. Сколиотическая болезнь и ее лечение. Ташкент, 1972.
13. Чаклин В.Д. Ортопедия. М., 1957. Кн. 2.
14. Шатохин В.Д., Колчин Д.В., Колесов В.В. Ранняя диагностика и консервативное лечение сколиоза у детей. Тольятти, 2005.
15. Cobb J.R. Outline for the study of scoliosis // Instr. Course Lectures. Ann Arbor, Michigan: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 1948. Vol. 5. P. 261–275.
16. Cotrel Y., Dubousset J. C-D Instrumentation en Chirurgie Rachidienne: Principes, Technique, Erreurs et Pieges. Paris, 1992.
17. Marty C., Legave J., Duval-Beaupére G. [Normal sagittal equilibrium of the spine. Its relations with the pelvic parameters. Its dysfunctionings: origin of lowback pain] // Resonances Europeennes du Rachis. 1997. N 15. P. 21–28. French.
18. Moe’s Textbook of Scoliosis and Other Spinal Deformities / Bradford D.S., Lonstein J.E., Ogilvie J.W., et al. (eds). 2nd ed. Phyladelphia, 1987.
19. Weiss H.R. Die Indikation zur konservativen Behandlung der Skoliose aus ärtliche
Review
For citations:
Tesakov D.K., Tesakova D.D. CHANGES IN PLASTIC ANATOMY OF THE TRUNK IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE PROGRESSIVE SCOLIOSIS. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2008;(4):013-019. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2008.4.13-19
Email this article 