PATIENT SELF-ASSESSMENT OF LONG-TERM RESULTS OF SURGERY FOR IDIOPATHIC AND CONGENITAL SCOLIOSIS
https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2012.4.19-25
Abstract
Objective. To analyze long-term results of surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis and congenital spinal deformity using the patient self-assessment SRS-24 questionnaires.
Material and Methods. The study included 121 patients operated on for idiopathic (106) and congenital (15) scoliosis using third generation segmental instrumentation (112 cases) and Harrington distraction rod (9 cases). Patients completed the SRS-24 questionnaire in 6, 12, 24 and more than 60 months after surgery. A total number of 448 questionnaires were analyzed.
Results. Girls’ assessment of surgery outcome at five year follow-up was in whole higher, though they had more pronounced pain syndrome. Patients with congenital scoliosis gave lower estimates in most domains than those with idiopathic scoliosis. Segmental instrumentation in all seven domains had the advantage of the Harrington distraction rod. As the follow-up period increased the estimate of the achieved effect raised. Rib hump resection caused increase in patient self-assessment of the treatment result in all cases.
Conclusion. Patient-reported outcome survey using SRS-24 questionnaire is simple, easy to interpret, and effective method. The obtained data showed the high quality of achieved results.
About the Authors
Mikhail Vitalievich Mikhailovsky
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena Vladimirovna Gubina
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksandr Yurievich Sergunin
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vyacheslav Viktorovich Novikov
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Ветрилэ С.Т., Кисель А.А., Кулешов А.А. Исследование изменения самооценки, качества жизни и удовлетворенности пациентов результатами хирургической коррекции диспластического сколиоза // Хирургия позвоночника. 2004. № 2. С. 40–44.
2. Губина Е.В., Михайловский М.В., Ханаев А.Л. Удовлетворенность результатами хирургического лечения пациентов с идиопатическим сколиозом после резекции реберного горба // Травматология и ортопедия XXI века: Тез. докл. VIII съезда травматологов-ортопедов России. Самара, 2006. C. 677–678.
3. Михайловский М.В., Губина Е.В. Оперативное лечение сколиоза – оценка результатов инструментом SRS // Адаптация различных систем организма при сколиотической деформации позвоночника. Методы лечения: М-лы междунар. симп. М., 2003. С. 125–128.
4. Михайловский М.В., Садовой М.А. Оперативное лечение сколиотической болезни: результаты, исходы. Новосибирск, 1993.
5. Садовой М.А. Медико-социальные критерии в комплексной оценке исходов заболевания у больных сколиотической болезнью после хирургического лечения: Автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. Новосибирск, 1988.
6. Хирургия идиопатического сколиоза: ближайшие и отдаленные результаты / Под ред. М.В. Михайловского. Новосибирск, 2007.
7. Bonnett C, Brown JC, Cross B, et al. Posterior spinal fusion with Harrington rod instrumentation in consecutive patients. Contemp Orthop. 1980; 2: 396–399.
8. Chapman JR, Dettori JR, Norvell DC (eds). Spine Classifications and Severity Measures. Thieme Medical Publishers, 2009.
9. Codman EA. The product of a hospital. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1914; 18: 491–496.
10. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine. 1999; 24: 1435–1440.
11. Harrington PR, Dickson JR. An eleven year clinical investigation of Harrington instrument. Clin Orthop. 1973; 93: 113–130.
12. James JI. Idiopathic scoliosis; the prognosis, diagnosis, and operative indications related to curve patterns and the age at onset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1954; 36: 36–49.
13. Moskowitz A, Moe JH, Winter RB, et al. Longterm follow-up of scoliosis fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980; 62: 364–376.
14. White SF, Asher MA, Lai SM, et al. Patients’ perceptions of overall function, pain and appearance after primary posterior instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1999; 24: 1693–1700.
Review
For citations:
Mikhailovsky M.V., Gubina E.V., Sergunin A.Yu., Novikov V.V. PATIENT SELF-ASSESSMENT OF LONG-TERM RESULTS OF SURGERY FOR IDIOPATHIC AND CONGENITAL SCOLIOSIS. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2012;(4):19-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2012.4.19-25
Email this article 