Risk factors for surgical site infection in thoracic and lumbosacral spine surgery: retrospective study results

Objective. To specify risk factors for the development of surgical site infection in patients operated on for injuries and degenerative diseases of the thoracic and lumbosacral spine through the posterior median approach.

Material and Methods. The study included formalized case histories of 415 patients (207 men, 208 women) who were operated on for degenerative diseases (n = 385) or unstable injuries (n = 30) of the spine. The average age of patients was 47 ± 18 years. Out of them, 230 patients had concomitant chronic diseases requiring constant drug treatment. Before statistical processing, the data obtained in the study were classified according to a generally accepted method to determine the possibility of using different statistical methods when comparing groups. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I included patients with pyoinflammatory complications, and Group II – without pyoinflammatory complications.

Results. It was revealed that the following factors significantly affect the development of postoperative wound suppuration: the use of metal fixation, external drainage of the wound for more than four days, the use of monocoagulation from the level of subcutaneous fat, the installation of a retractor for a period of more than 1 hour, blood loss of more than 300 ml, leaving absorbable hemostatic materials in the wound, suturing of muscles in the area of laminectomy, and applying intradermal (cosmetic) sutures. Patient age, preoperative bed day number, skin isolation technique (or lack thereof), duration of surgery, and surgeon experience do not affect the risk of the surgical site infection.

Conclusion. Despite the fact that most of the identified risk factors for postoperative wound suppuration are reduced to more complex and prolonged intervention which is more difficult for a patient to tolerate, some of the identified risk factors are potentially removable.

1. Крылов В.В., Гринь А.А. Травма позвоночника и спинного мозга. М., 2014. С. 24–26. [Krylov VV, Grin AA. Spine and Spinal Cord Injury. Moscow, 2014. In Russian].

2. Гринь А.А., Кайков А.К., Крылов В.В. Профилактика и лечение осложнений у больных с позвоночно-спинномозговой травмой (часть 1) // Нейрохирургия. 2014. № 4. С. 75–86. [Grin’ AA, Kaykov AK, Krylov VV. The prophylaxis and treatment of various complications at patients with spinal trauma (part 1). Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2014;(4):75–86. In Russian]. DOI: 10.17650/1683-3295-2014-0-4-75-86.

3. Bianchi C, Ballard IL, Abou–Zamzam A, Teruya TH, Abu-Assal ML. Anterior retroperitoneal lumbosacral spine exposure: operative technique and results. Ann Vasс Surg. 2003;17:137–142. DOI:10.1007/s10016-001-0396-x.

4. Lonstein J, Winter R, Moe J, Gaines D. Wound infection with Harrington instrumentation and spine fusion for scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1973;(96):222–233.

5. Bassewitz HL, Fishgrund JS, Herkowitz HN. Postoperative spine infections. Semin Spine Surg. 2000;12:203–211.

6. Blood AG, Sandoval MF, Burger E, Halverson-Carpenter K. Risk and protective factors associated with surgical infections among spine patients. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017;18:234–249. DOI: 10.1089/sur.2016.183.

7. Алексанян М.М., Хейло А.Л., Микаелян К.П., Гемджян Э.Г., Аганесов А.Г. Микрохирургическая дискэктомия в поясничном отделе позвоночника: эффективность, болевой синдром, фактор ожирения // Хирургия позвоночника. 2018. Т. 15. № 1. С. 42–48. [Alexanyan MM, Kheilo AL, Mikaelian KP, Gemdzhian EG, Aganesov AG. Microsurgical discectomy in the limbar spine: efficiency, pain syndrome and obesity. Hir. Pozvonoc. 2018;15(1):42–48. In Russian]. DOI: 10.14531/ss2018.1.42-48.

8. Vaccaro AR, Oner C, Kepler CK, Dvorak M, Schnake K, Bellabarba C, Rein- hold M, Aarabi B, Kandziora F, Chapman J, Shanmuganathan R, Fehlings M, Vialle L. AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status and key modifiers. Spine. 2013;38:2028–2037. DOI: 10.1097/ BRS.0b013e3182a8a381.

9. Рекомендательный протокол лечения острой осложненной и неосложненной травмы позвоночника у взрослых (Ассоциация нейрохирургов РФ). Части 1–3 // Вопросы нейрохирургии им. Н.Н. Бурденко. 2014–2015. Т. 78–79. [An advisory protocol for treatment of acute complicated and uncomplicated spinal cord injury in adults (association of neurosurgeons of the Russian Federation). Part 1–3. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2015–2016. Vol. 78–79. In Russian].

10. Greenberg MS, ed. Handbook of Neurosurgery. 8th ed. Thieme Verlagsgruppe, 2016.

11. Simpson JM, Silveri CP, Balderston RA, Simeone FA, An HS. The results of operations on the lumbar spine in patients who have diabetes mellitus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1823–1829. DOI:10.2106/00004623-199312000-00013.

12. Veeravagu A, Patil CG, Lad SP, Boakye M. Risk factors for postoperative spinal wound infections after spinal decompression and fusion surgeries. Spine. 2009;34:1869–1872. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181adc989.

13. An HS, Jenis LG. Complications of Spine Surgery. Treatment and Preventions. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2005:11–17; 17–22; 23–31; 31–41; 79–81; 143–157.

14. Waly F, Alzahrani MM, Abduljabbar FH, Landry T, Ouellet J, Moran K, Dettori JR. The outcome of using closed suction wound drains in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review. Global Spine J. 2015;5:479–485. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1566288.