Treatment of patients with posttraumatic deformities of the thoracolumbar spine using Schwab 5 osteotomy through combined and posterior approaches

Objective. To analyze the results of surgical treatment of patients with rigid posttraumatic deformities of the thoracolumbar spine operated on using Schwab 5 osteotomy through combined and posterior approaches.

Material and Methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Study group included 60 patients (m/f = 25/35). Median age was 48 (26–58) years, median time since injury was 11 (9–14) months, and minimum follow-up period was 2 years. A two-stage intervention with resection of the vertebral body, correction of the deformity, and placement of an interbody implant through the anterior approach followed by final fixation through the posterior approach (VCR_a+p group) was performed in 29 cases. Vertebral body resection through the posterior approach with correction of the deformity, installation of an interbody implant, and rigid transpedicular fixation (VCR_p group) was performed in 31 cases. In all patients, the magnitude of correction was assessed, as well as the following parameters: frontal balance, sagittal balance, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, sacral slope and pelvic tilt. The results of treatment were evaluated in dynamics by the level of pain syndrome (VAS) and quality of life (ODI), as well as based on the analysis of postoperative complications.

Results. The groups were comparable in terms of gender, age, magnitude of the kyphotic component of the deformity, level of pain syndrome and degree of initial neurological deficit (p > 0.05). Correction of the deformity kyphotic component was significantly better in patients in the VCR_p group compared to those in the VCR_a+p group (p = 0.036). Both groups showed a significant decrease in the level of pain syndrome 3 months after surgery. However, further follow-up showed a tendency for back pain to increase on average one year after surgery in the VCR_a+p group. A total of 67 complications were revealed in 40 (66.7 %) patients. Herewith, in the early postoperative period there were 55 complications in 31 patients, and in the late period there were 12 complications in 9 patients. Analysis of early complications showed a higher incidence of anemia (p = 0.002) and liquorrhea (p = 0.017) in the VCR_p group compared to those in the VCR_a+p group. The incidence of long-term complications did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.866). An increase in back pain in the long-term period was observed in 12 (41.4 %) patients of the VCR_a+p group and in 4 (12.9 %) patients of the VCR_p group. Analysis of risk factors for this condition showed a tendency for back pain to increase in the long-term period in patients with residual local deformity against the background of low pelvic index values.

Conclusion. Correction of the kyphotic component of deformity was significantly better in patients of the VCR_p group, which was accompanied by greater surgical trauma and incidence of early postoperative complications. The tendency of patients’ quality of life to deteriorate in the long-term follow-up period seems to be related to the occurrence of pain syndrome in the lumbar spine in patients with residual kyphotic deformity against the background of initially low compensatory capabilities.

1. Прудникова О.Г., Хомченков М.В. Посттравматические деформации позвоночника: актуальность, проблемы, ревизионная хирургия // Хирургия позвоночника. 2019. Т. 16. № 4. С. 36–44. [Prudnikova OG, Khomchenkov MV. Post-traumatic deformities of the spine: relevance, problems, and revision surgery. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2019;16(4):36–44]. DOI: 10.14531/ss2019.4.36-44.

2. Avila JM, Garcia OS, Vergara PA, Cisneros AC. Surgical correction of post-traumatic kyphosis with osteotomies in the spine. Coluna/Columna. 2019;18:60–63. DOI: 10.1590/S1808-185120191801215074.

3. Joaquim AF, de Almeida Bastos DC, Jorge Torres HH, Patel AA. Thoracolumbar injury classification and injury severity score system: a literature review of its safety. Global Spine J. 2016;6:80–85. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1554775.

4. Усиков В.Д., Фадеев Е.М., Пташников Д.А., Магомедов Ш.Ш., Докиш М.Ю. Тактика хирургического лечения больных с застарелыми повреждениями позвоночника и спинного мозга // Травматология и ортопедия России. 2010. № 2(16). С. 76–78. [Usikov VD, Fadeev EM, Ptashnikov DA, Magomedov ShSh, Dokish MYu. Tactic of surgical treatment of patients with the old vertebral and spinal cord injuries // Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2010;2(16):76–78]. DOI: 10.21823/2311-2905-2010-0-2-76-78.

5. Щедренок В.В, Орлов С.В., Могучая О.В. Нестабильность при застарелых повреждениях позвоночника и спинного мозга // Травматология и ортопедия России. 2010. № 2(56). С. 79–81. [Shchedrenok VV, Orlov SV, Moguchaya OV. Instability at chronic damages of a backbone and spinal cord // Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2010;2(56):79–81]. DOI: 10.21823/2311-2905-2010-0-2-79-81.

6. Дулаев А.К., Хан И.Ш., Дулаева Н.М. Причины неудовлетворительных анатомо-функциональных результатов лечения больных с переломами грудного и поясничного отделов позвоночника // Хирургия позвоночника. 2009. № 2. С. 17–24. [Dulaev AK, Khan IS, Dulaeva NM. Causes of anatomical and functional failure of treatment in patients with thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2009;(2):17–24]. DOI: 10.14531/ss2009.2.17-24.

7. Рерих В.В., Борзых К.О. Посттравматические деформации грудного и поясничного отделов позвоночника у пациентов в позднем периоде позвоночно-спинномозговой травмы после ранее проведенных оперативных вмешательств // Международный журнал прикладных и фундаментальных исследований. 2015. № 12–14. С. 657–660. [Rerikh VV, Borzykh KO. Post-traumatic deformities of the thoracic and lumbar spine in patients in the late period of spinal cord injury after previous surgical interventions. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research. 2015;12–4:657–660].

8. Рерих В.В., Борзых К.О. Этапное хирургическое лечение посттравматических деформаций грудного и поясничного отделов позвоночника // Хирургия позвоночника. 2016. № 4. С. 21–27. [Rerikh VV, Borzykh KO. Staged surgical treatment of posttraumatic deformities in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2016;13(4):21–27]. DOI: 10.14531/ss2016.4.21-27.

9. Vaccaro AR, Silber JS. Post-traumatic spinal deformity. Spine. 2001;26(24 Suppl):S111–S118. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200112151-00019.

10. El-Sharkawi MM, Koptan WMT, El-Miligui YH, Said GZ. Comparison between pedicle subtraction osteotomy and anterior corpectomy and plating for correcting post-traumatic kyphosis: a multicenter study. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:1434–1440. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1720-y.

11. Hu W, Wang B, Run H, Zhang X, Wang Y. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy and disc resection with cage placement in post-traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis, a retrospective study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016;11:112. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-016-0447-1.

12. Пантелеев А.А., Миронов С.П., Бухтин К.М., Сажнев М.Л., Казьмин А.И., Переверзев В.С., Колесов С.В. Эффективность четырехстержневой фиксации при выполнении педикулярной субтракционной остеотомии позвоночника // Травматология и ортопедия России. 2018. Т. 24. № 3. С. 65–73. [Panteleyev AA, Mironov SP, Buhtin KM, Sazhnev ML, Kazmin AI, Pereverzev VS, Kolesov SV. Effectiveness of four-rod fixation for pedicle substraction spinal osteotomy // Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2018;24(3):65–73]. DOI: 10.21823/2311-2905-2018-24-3-65-73.

13. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine. 2005;30:346–353 DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000152379.54463.65.

14. Barrey C, Roussouly P, Le Huec JC, D’Acunzi G, Perrin G. Compensatory mechanisms contributing to keep the sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J. 2013;22 Suppl 6:S834–S841. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-3030-z.

15. Laouissat F, Sebaaly A, Gehrchen M, Roussouly P. Classification of normal sagittal spine alignment: refounding the Roussouly classification. Eur Spine J. 2018;27:

16. –2011. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5111-x.

17. Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL. Sagittal parameters of the spine: biomechanical approach. Eur Spine J. 2011;20 Suppl 5:578–585. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1924-1.

18. Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL. Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J. 2011;20 Suppl 5:609–618. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1928-x.

19. Дулаев А.К., Мануковский В.А., Аликов З.Ю., Горанчук Д.В., Дулаева Н.М., Абуков Д.Н., Булахтин Ю.А., Мушкин М.А. Диагностика и хирургическое лечение неблагоприятных последствий позвоночно-спинномозговой травмы // Хирургия позвоночника. 2014. № 1. С. 71–77. [Dulaev AK, Manukovsky VA, Alikov ZYu, Goranchuk DV, Dulaeva NM, Abukov DN, Bulakhtin YuA, Mushkin MA. Diagnosis and surgical treatment of adverse consequences of spinal trauma. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2014;1:71–77]. DOI: 10.14531/ss2014.1.71-77.

20. Рерих В.В., Борзых К.О., Рахматиллаев Ш.Н. Атипичные сегментарные корригирующие вертебротомии при лечении грубых посттравматических кифозов грудного отдела позвоночника // Хирургия позвоночника. 2014. № 4. С. 20–24. [Rerikh VV, Borzykh KO, Rakhmatillaev ShN. Atypical segmental corrective vertebrectomy in the treatment of post-traumatic thoracic kyphosis. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2014;4:20–24]. DOI: 10.14531/ss2014.4.20-24.

21. Рерих В.В., Борзых К.О., Шелякина О.В. Посттравматические деформации грудного и поясничного отделов. Клинические рекомендации. 2016. [Rerikh VV, Borzykh KO, Shelyakina OV. Posttraumatic Deformities of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Clinical recommendations. 2016].

22. Cecchinato R, Berjano P, Damilano M, Lamartina C. Spinal osteotomies to treat post-traumatic thoracolumbar deformity. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24 Suppl 1:S31–S37. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-014-1464-6.

23. Khoueir P, Oh BC, Wang MY. Delayed posttraumatic thoracolumbar spinal deformities: diagnosis and management. Neurosurgery 2008;63(3 Suppl):117–124. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000320385.27734.CB.

24. Gao R, Wu J, Yuan W, Yang C, Pan F, Zhou X. Modified partial pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of post-traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis. Spine J. 2015;15:2009–2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.04.047.

25. Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Lenke LG, Baldus C, Blanke K. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:

26. –463. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200303000-00009.

27. Debarge R, Demey G, Roussouly P. Sagittal balance analysis after pedicle subtraction osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(Suppl 5):619–625. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1929-9.

28. Jo DJ, Kim YS, Kim SM, Kim KT, Seo EM. Clinical and radiological outcomes of modified posterior closing wedge osteotomy for the treatment of posttraumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23:510–517. DOI: 10.3171/2015.1.SPINE131011.

29. Xi YM, Pan M, Wang ZJ, Zhang GQ, Shan R, Liu YJ, Chen BH, Hu YG. Correction of post-traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis using pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013;23 Suppl 1:S59–S66. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-013-1168-3.

30. Sebaaly A, Grobost P, Mallam L, Roussouly P. Description of the sagittal alignment of the degenerative human spine. Eur Spine J. 2018;27:489–496. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5404-0.

31. Mazel C, Ajavon L. Malunion of post-traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018;104(1S):S55–S62. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.04.018.

32. Pishnamaz M, Scholz M, Trobisch PD, Lichte P, Herren C, Hildebrand F, Kobbe P. [Posttraumatic deformity of the thoracolumbar spine]. Unfallchirurg. 2020;123:143–154. In German. DOI: 10.1007/s00113-019-00764-8.

33. Camacho JE, Gentry RD, Ye IB, Thomson AE, Bruckner JJ, Kung JE, Cavanaugh DL, Koh EY, Gelb DE, Ludwig SC. Open vs percutaneous pedicle instrumentation for kyphosis correction in traumatic thoracic and thoracolumbar spine injuries. Int J Spine Surg. 2022;16:1009–1015. DOI: 10.14444/8329.

34. Olivares OB, Carrasco MV, Pinto GI, Tonda FN, Riera Martínez JA, Gonzalez AS. Preoperative and postoperative sagittal alignment and compensatory mechanisms in patients with posttraumatic thoracolumbar deformities who undergo corrective surgeries. Int J Spine Surg. 2021;15:585–590. DOI: 10.14444/8079.

35. Zeng Y, Chen Z, Guo Z, Qi Q, Li W, Sun C. Complications of correction for focal kyphosis after posterior osteotomy and the corresponding management. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013;26:367–374. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182499237.

36. Zeng Y, Chen Z, Sun C, Li W, Qi Q, Guo Z, Zhao Y, Yang Y. Posterior surgical correction of posttraumatic kyphosis of the thoracolumbar segment. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013;26:37–41. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318231d6a3.

37. Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Edwards C, Lenke LG, Iffrig TM, Berra A, Baldus C, Blanke K. Complications and outcomes of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance. Spine. 2003;28:2093–2101. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000090891.60232.70.

38. Kose KC, Bozduman O, Yenigul AE, Igrek S. Spinal osteotomies: indications, limits and pitfalls. EFORT Open Rev. 2017;2:73–82. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160069.