Preview

Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika)

Advanced search

Revision surgery for chronic pyogenic spondylitis: analysis of a monocenter cohort with a minimum 1 year follow-up

https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2024.3.69-77

Abstract

Objective. To analyze the structure of complications and follow-up results of revision surgeries in patients operated on for chronic nonspecific spondylitis (CNS).

Material and Methods. Revision interventions due to the development of complications corresponding to type IIIB according to Clavien – Dindo classification were performed in 78 patients (mean age 58 years 6 months ± 11 years 2 months) with CNS who had previously undergone reconstructive surgery on the spine. The timing of complications was analyzed according to Prinz classification. The structure of complications and factors potentially influencing their development were evaluated. Predictors of infectious and orthopedic complications were differentiated.  Follow-up period was at least 1 year (M ± m = 3 years 3 months ± 1 year 2 months). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, version 22.0.

Results. The estimated frequency of Clavien – Dindo grade IIIB complications after surgical treatment of CNS was 11.3 %. In 44 (56.4 %) of 78 cases, indications for revision surgery were due to infectious complications, and in 34 (43.6 %) – to orthopedic complications. The Charlson comorbidity index was 4.5 ± 1.8 with no intergroup differences between infectious and orthopedic complications (p = 0.052). The duration of primary interventions (p < 0.001) and blood loss (p = 0.010) were higher in patients with infectious complications. The average preoperative ODI was 48.3 ± 13, with a higher value in the infectious complications group (F = 5.146, p = 0.026). The timing of complications and the location of primary reconstruction influenced both the ODI score (F = 6.622, p < 0.001) and the type of complications (Pearson’s χ2 = 14.224, p = 0.014). The patient age had no effect on the location of complications (p = 0.349, F value = 1.137). Preoperative neurologic deficit was noted in 23 patients, regression was recorded in 11 cases, including complete in 6 and within the same functional class in 5 cases. The complication rate in the long-term period after revision surgery was 14.1 %.

Conclusion. Infectious complications of primary interventions in patients with chronic nonspecific spondylitis prevail over orthopedic ones. Significant predictors of the development of complications are the patient age > 55 years, the Charlson comorbidity index > 3, duration of surgery > 2 hours 30 minutes, and blood loss volume > 250 ml.

About the Authors

D. G. Naumov
St. Petersburg Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology; Saint-Petersburg State University 2–4 Ligovsky pr., St. Petersburg, 191036, Russia; 7/9 Universitetskaya embankment, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia
Russian Federation

MD, PhD, leading researcher, deputy director for traumatology and orthopedics;
Assistant professor of the Department of General Surgery



A. Yu. Mushkin
St. Petersburg Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology; Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University 2–4 Ligovsky pr., St. Petersburg, 191036, Russia; 6–8 L’va Tolstogo str., St. Petersburg, 197022, Russia
Russian Federation

DMSc, Prof., leading researcher, Head of the department of vertebrology, traumatology-orthopedics;
Professor of the Department of traumatology and orthopedics



A. A. Vishnevsky
St. Petersburg Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology 2–4 Ligovsky pr., St. Petersburg, 191036, Russia
Russian Federation

DMSc, leading researcher



References

1. Базаров А.Ю., Лебедев И.А., Баринов А.Л., Ребятникова М.А., Фарайон А.О., Паськов Р.В., Сергеев К.С., Осинцев В.М. Гематогенный остеомиелит позвоночника: клиническая и микробиологическая характеристика // Хирургия позвоночника. 2020. Т. 17. № 1. С. 102–109. [Bazarov AYu, Lebedev IA, Barinov AL, Rebyatnikova MA, Faryon AO, Paskov RV, Sergeyev KS, Osintsev VM. Hematogenous pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: clinical and microbiological characteristics. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2020;17(1):102–109]. DOI: 10.14531/ss2020.1.102-109.

2. Herren C, Jung N, Pishnamaz M, Breuninger M, Siewe J, Sobottke R. Spondylodiscitis: diagnosis and treatment options. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017;114:875–882. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0875.

3. Наумов Д.Г., Ткач С.Г., Мушкин А.Ю., Макогонова М.Е. Хронические инфекционные поражения шейного отдела позвоночника у взрослых: анализ моноцентровой когорты и данных литературы // Хирургия позвоночника. 2021. Т. 18. № 3. С. 68–76. [Naumov DG, Tkach SG, Mushkin AYu, Makogonova ME. Chronic infectious lesions of the cervical spine in adults: monocentric cohort analysis and literature review. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2021;18(3):68–76]. DOI: 10.14531/ss2021.3.68-76.

4. Homagk L, Homagk N, Klauss JR, Roehl K, Hofmann GO, Marmelstein D. Spondylodiscitis severity code: scoring system for the classification and treatment of non-specific spondylodiscitis. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:1012–1020. DOI: 10.1007/ s00586-015-3936-8.

5. Наумов Д.Г., Вишневский А.А., Соловьева Н.С., Масалова Н.Ю., Яблонский П.К., Карпушин А.А. Микробиологический спектр возбудителей ИОХВ у пациентов с хроническими инфекционными спондилитами, требующими ревизионных вмешательств: результаты сплошного моноцентрового 5-летнего мониторинга // Хирургия позвоночника. 2023. Т. 20. № 4. С. 68–74. [Naumov DG, Vishnevskiy AA, Solovieva NS, Masalova NYu, Yablonsky PK, Karpushin AA. Microbiological spectrum of SSI pathogens in patients with chronic infectious spondylitis requiring revision surgery: results of continuous monocentric 5-year monitoring. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2023;20(4):68–74]. DOI: 10.14531/ss2023.4.68-74.

6. Pola E, Taccari F, Autore G, Giovannenze F, Pambianco V, Cauda R, Maccauro G, Fantoni M. Multidisciplinary management of pyogenic spondylodiscitis: epidemiological and clinical features, prognostic factors and long-term outcomes in 207 patients. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(Suppl 2):229–236. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5598-9.

7. Мушкин А.Ю., Вишневский А.А., Перецманас Е.О., Базаров А.Ю., Басанкин И.В. Инфекционные поражения позвоночника: проект национальных клинических рекомендаций // Хирургия позвоночника. 2019 Т. 16 № 4 С. 63–76. [Mushkin AYu, Vishnevsky AA, Peretsmanas EO, Bazarov AYu, Basankin IV. Infectious lesions of the spine: draft national clinical guidelines. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2019;16(4):63–76]. DOI: 10.14531/ss2019.4.63-76.

8. Pola E, Autore G, Formica VM, Pambianco V, Colangelo D, Cauda R, Fantoni M. New classification for the treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis: validation study on a population of 250 patients with a follow-up of 2 years. Eur Spine J. 2017;26

9. (Suppl 4):479–488. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5043-5.

10. Berbari EF, Kanj SS, Kowalski TJ, Darouiche RO, Widmer AF, Schmitt SK, Hendershot EF, Holtom PD, Huddleston PM 3rd, Petermann GW, Osmon DR. 2015 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of native vertebral osteomyelitis in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61:e26–e46. DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ482.

11. Базаров А.Ю., Наумов Д.Г., Мушкин А.Ю., Сергеев К.С., Рябых С.О., Вишневский А.А., Бурцев А.В., Мушкин М.А. Новая классификация спондилодисцитов: возможности валидизации и мультидисциплинарного межэкспертного консенсуса // Хирургия позвоночника. 2022. Т. 19. № 4. С. 68–76. [Bazarov AYu, Naumov DG, Mushkin АYu, Sergeyev KS, Ryabykh SO, Vishnevsky AA, Burtsev AV, Mushkin MA. A new classification of spondylodiscitis: possibility of validation and multidisciplinary expert consensus. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2022;19(4)68–76]. DOI: 10.14531/ss2022.4.68-76.

12. Nota SP, Braun Y, Ring D, Schwab JH. Incidence of surgical site infection after spine surgery: what is the impact of the definition of infection? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:1612–1619. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3933-y.

13. Whitmore RG, Stephen J, Stein SC, Campbell PG, Yadla S, Harrop JS, Sharan AD, Maltenfort MG, Ratliff JK. Patient comorbidities and complications after spinal surgery: a societal-based cost analysis. Spine. 2012;37:1065–1071. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823da22d.

14. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Sansur CA, Berven SH, Fu KM, Broadstone PA, Choma TJ, Goytan MJ, Noordeen HH, Knapp DR Jr, Hart RA, Donaldson WF 3rd, Polly DW Jr, Perra JH, Boachie-Adjei O. Rates of infection after spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine. 2011;36:556–563. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181eadd41.

15. Lee SH, Kim J, Kim TH. Treatment guideline for patients with native culture-negative pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022;480:124–136. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001866.

16. Basak AT, Cakıcı N, Ozbek MA, Hekimoglu M, Cerezci O, Ates O, Oktenoglu T, Sasani M, Ozer AF. A combined diagnosis and treatment algorithm for spine infection management: a single-center experience. Cureus. 2022;14:e28251. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28251.

17. Nasser R, Kosty JA, Shah S, Wang J, Cheng J. Risk factors and prevention of surgical site infections following spinal procedures. Global Spine J. 2018;8(4 suppl):44S–48S. DOI: 10.1177/2192568218806275.

18. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

19. Burns PB, Rohrich RJ, Chung KC. The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:305–310. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318219c171.

20. Prinz V, Bayerl S, Renz N, Trampuz A, Czabanka M, Woitzik J, Vajkoczy P, Finger T. High frequency of low-virulent microorganisms detected by sonication of pedicle screws: a potential cause for implant failure. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;31:424–429. DOI: 10.3171/2019.1.SPINE181025.

21. Falavigna A, Jimenez-Avila JM. Education in Research: from the Idea to Publication. Caxias do Sul, RS: Educs, 2015.

22. Pesenti S, Pannu T, Andres-Bergos J, Lafage R, Smith JS, Glassman S, de Kleuver M, Pellise F, Schwab F, Lafage V. What are the risk factors for surgical site infection after spinal fusion? A meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2018;27:2469–2480. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5733-7.

23. Blumberg TJ, Woelber E, Bellabarba C, Bransford R, Spina N. Predictors of increased cost and length of stay in the treatment of postoperative spine surgical site infection. Spine J. 2018;18:300–306. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.07.173.

24. Barbanti-Brodano G, Griffoni C, Halme J, Tedesco G, Terzi S, Bandiera S, Ghermandi R, Evangelisti G, Girolami M, Pipola V, Gasbarrini A, Falavigna A. Spinal surgery complications: an unsolved problem-Is the World Health Organization Safety Surgical Checklist an useful tool to reduce them? Eur Spine J. 2020;29:927–936. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-06203-x.

25. Zhou J, Wang R, Huo X, Xiong W, Kang L, Xue Y. Incidence of surgical site infection after spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine. 2020;45:208–216. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003218.

26. Heuer A, Strahl A, Viezens L, Koepke LG, Stangenberg M, Dreimann M. The Hamburg Spondylodiscitis Assessment Score (HSAS) for immediate evaluation of mortality risk on hospital admission. J Clin Med. 2022;11:660. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030660.


Review

For citations:


Naumov D.G., Mushkin A.Yu., Vishnevsky A.A. Revision surgery for chronic pyogenic spondylitis: analysis of a monocenter cohort with a minimum 1 year follow-up. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2024;21(3):69-77. https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2024.3.69-77



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1810-8997 (Print)
ISSN 2313-1497 (Online)