Preview

Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika)

Advanced search

The predictive factors for resorption of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation

https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2024.4.63-70

Abstract

Objective. To determine the timing and to identify predictive factors of resorption of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

Material and Methods. This study is retrospective cohort and is devoted to the study of two groups of patients: Group 1 with herniated disc resorption and Group 2 with no resorption. All patients underwent MRI of the lumbar spine at the onset of initial symptoms, and the second study was conducted during the second visit. Based on the MRI results, the following parameters were assessed: the degree of intervertebral disc degeneration according to the Pfirrmann classification, the degree of facet joint degeneration according to the Grogan classification, the type of hernia, the degree of migration of the hernial fragment according to the Komori classification, Modic changes, the state of the endplates according to the Rajasekaran classification, the presence of retrolisthesis and the presence of resorption of the hernial fragment in dynamics. The Syngo.via workstation was used to measure the volume of the hernial fragment. Resorption of a disc herniation was considered to be a decrease in its volume by more than 50 % of the initial value with mandatory relief of radicular pain syndrome. The identification of resorption predictors was performed by building logistic regression models. Single-factor models were used to identify individual predictors associated with the target event. For continuous indicators, the ROC analysis identified the maximum cut-point values according to the Youden’s index.

Results. Group 1 included 141 patients, and Group 2 (comparison) – 93. Statistically significant differences between groups were found in several parameters. The average age of patients was 6 years younger; the interval between MRI studies was on average 2 months longer; and the protrusive type hernias were more in Group 2 than in Group 1. Gender, body mass index, the presence of retrolisthesis and smoking habit did not differ significantly between the groups. In Group 2, there were more cases of hernia at the L5–S1 level, which is associated with a higher incidence of hernia at this level. Using logistic regression models, it was revealed that hernia volume, hernia type according to the Komori classification, body mass index and Modic changes are significant factors for hernia resorption. A hernia volume of more than 1.1 cm3, no Modic change, hernia types II and III according to Komori, and body mass index of less than 30.24 increase the chances of disc herniation resorption.

Conclusion. The average time to resorption of herniated lumbar disc is 5.5 months. Factors that predict the resorption include types II and III of hernia according to the Komori classification (correspond to sequestered herniation), the absence of Modic changes, hernial fragment volume larger than 1.1 cm3, and body mass index less than 30.24.

About the Authors

A. J. Sanginov
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan 17 Frunze str., Novosibirsk, 630091, Russia
Russian Federation

MD, PhD, researcher, Research Department of Neurovertebrology



I. D. Isakov
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan 17 Frunze str., Novosibirsk, 630091, Russia
Russian Federation

junior researcher, Research Department of Neurovertebrology



V. V. Belozerov
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan 17 Frunze str., Novosibirsk, 630091, Russia
Russian Federation

MD, PhD, researcher, Research Department of Neurovertebrology



E. A. Mushkachev
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan 17 Frunze str., Novosibirsk, 630091, Russia
Russian Federation

 junior researcher, Research Department of Neurovertebrology



A. V. Peleganchuk
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan 17 Frunze str., Novosibirsk, 630091, Russia
Russian Federation

MD, PhD, senior researcher, Research Department of Neurovertebrology, Head of the Department of Neurosurgery No. 2



References

1. Penchev P, Ilyov IG, Todorov T, Petrov PP, Traykov P. Comprehensive analysis of treatment approaches for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review. Cureus. 2024;16:e67899. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67899.

2. Motiei-Langroudi R, Sadeghian H, Seddighi AS. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging factors which may predict the need for surgery in lumbar disc herniation. Asian Spine J. 2014;8:446–452. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.4.446.

3. Lorio M, Kim C, Araghi A, Inzana J, Yue JJ. International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2019 – surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. Int J Spine Surg. 2020;14:1–17. DOI: 10.14444/7001.

4. Yoon WW, Koch J. Herniated discs: when is surgery necessary? EFORT Open Rev. 2021;6:526–530. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210020.

5. Zheng Y, Zhu C, Huang JF, Manoharasetty A, Zhang H. Spontaneous regression of lumbar disc herniation: four cases report and review of the literature. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2024;86:370–382. DOI: 10.18999/nagjms.86.3.370.

6. Guinto FC, Hashim H, Stumer M. CT demonstration of disk regression after conservative therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1984;5:632–633.

7. Zou T, Liu XY, Wang PC, Chen H, Wu PG, Feng XM, Sun HH. Incidence of spontaneous resorption of lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis. Clin Spine Surg. 2024;37:256–269. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001490.

8. Chiu CC, Chuang TY, Chang KH, Wu CH, Lin PW, Hsu WY. The probability of spontaneous regression of lumbar herniated disc: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29:184–195. DOI: 10.1177/0269215514540919.

9. Hong SJ, Kim DY, Kim H, Kim S, Shin KM, Kang SS. Resorption of massive lumbar disc herniation on MRI treated with epidural steroid injection: a retrospective study of 28 cases. Pain Physician. 2016;19:381–388.

10. Shan Z, Fan S, Xie Q, Suyou L, Liu J, Wang C, Zhao F. Spontaneous resorption of lumbar disc herniation is less likely when modic changes are present. Spine. 2014;39:736–744. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000259.

11. Lama P, Zehra U, Balkovec C, Claireaux HA, Flower L, Harding IJ, Dolan P, Adams MA. Significance of cartilage endplate within herniated disc tissue. Eur Spine J 2014;23:1869–1877. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3399-3.

12. Ding L, Teng X, Fan S, Zhao F. The association between Modic changes of lumbar endplates and spontaneous resorption of herniated intervertebral discs. Cell Biochem Biophys 2015;71:1357–1363. DOI: 10.1007/s12013-014-0357-y.

13. Autio RA, Karppinen J, Niinimaki J, Ojala R, Kurunlahti M, Haapea M, Vanharanta H, Tervonen O. Determinants of spontaneous resorption of intervertebral disc herniations. Spine 2006;31:1247–1252.

14. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000217681.83524.4a.

15. Seo JY, Roh YH, Kim YH, Ha KY. Three-dimensional analysis of volumetric changes in herniated discs of the lumbar spine: Does spontaneous resorption of herniated discs always occur? Eur Spine J. 2016;25:1393–1402. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3587-1.

16. Ma Z, Yu P, Jiang H, Li X, Qian X, Yu Z, Zhu Y, Liu J. Conservative treatment for giant lumbar disc herniation: clinical study in 409 cases. Pain Physician. 2021;24:E639–E648.

17. Zeng Z, Qin J, Guo L, Hirai T, Gui Z, Liu T, Su C, Yu D, Yan M. Prediction and mechanisms of spontaneous resorption in lumbar disc herniation: narrative review. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2023;8:235–242. DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2023-0152.

18. Zhong M, Liu JT, Jiang H, Mo W, Yu PF, Li XC, Xue RR. Incidence of spontaneous resorption of lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis. Pain Physician. 2017;20:E45–E52.

19. Kesikburun B, Eksioglu E, Turan A, Adiguzel E, Kesikburun S, Cakci A. Spontaneous regression of extruded lumbar disc herniation: Correlation with clinical outcome. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35:974–980. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.35.4.346.

20. Sucuoglu H, Barut AY. Clinical and radiological follow-up results of patients with sequestered lumbar disc herniation: a prospective cohort study. Med Princ Pract. 2021;30:244–252. DOI: 10.1159/000515308.

21. Rashed S, Vassiliou A, Starup-Hansen J, Tsang K. Systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive factors for spontaneous regression in lumbar disc herniation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2023;39:471–478. DOI: 10.3171/2023.6.SPINE23367.

22. Seo JH, Park G, Ju CI, Kim SW, Lee SM. Radiological analysis of symptomatic complications after bilateral laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Korean J Spine. 2012;9:18–23. DOI: 10.14245/kjs.2012.9.1.18.

23. Elkholy AR, Farid AM, Shamhoot EA. Spontaneous resorption of herniated lumbar disk: observational retrospective study in 9 patients. World Neurosurg. 2019;124:e453–e459. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.115.

24. Yu PF, Liu JT, Ma ZJ, Zhong M, Li XC, Jiang H. [Logistic regression analysis on the outcome predictive factors of ruptured lumbar disc herniation]. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018;31:522–527. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.06.008. In Chinese.

25. Komori H, Shinomiya K, Nakai O, Yamaura I, Takeda S, Furuya K. The natural history of herniated nucleus pulposus with radiculopathy. Spine. 1996;21:225–229. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199601150-00013.

26. Ahn SH, Ahn MW, Byun WM. Effect of the transligamentous extension of lumbar disc herniations on their regression and the clinical outcome of sciatica. Spine. 2000;25:475–480. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200002150-00014.

27. Hornung AL, Rudisill SS, Barajas JN, Harada G, Fitch AA, Leonard SF, Roberts AC, An HS, Albert HB, Tkachev A, Samartzis D. How does resorption differ among single-level and multilevel lumbar disc herniations? A prospective multi-imaging and clinical Phenotype study. Spine. 2024;49:763–771. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004955.


Review

For citations:


Sanginov A.J., Isakov I.D., Belozerov V.V., Mushkachev E.A., Peleganchuk A.V. The predictive factors for resorption of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2024;21(4):63-70. https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2024.4.63-70



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1810-8997 (Print)
ISSN 2313-1497 (Online)