ASSESSMENT OF CHANGES IN SELF-ESTIMATION, QUALITY OF LIFE AND PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH CDI SURGICAL CORRECTION FOR DYSPLASTIC SCOLIOSIS
Abstract
About the Authors
Stepan Timofeyevich VetrileRussian Federation
Aleksandra Alekseyevna Kisel
Russian Federation
Aleksandr Alekseyevich Kuleshov
Russian Federation
References
1. Губина Е.В., Михайловский М.В. Оперативноелечение сколиоза - оценка результатов инструментом SRS // Адаптация различных систем организма при сколиотической деформации позвоночника: Методы лечения: Тез. докл. Междунар. симпозиума. М., 2003. С. 125-128.
2. Кулешов А.А. Эффективность различных методов хирургического вмешательства на межпозвонковых дисках при сколиозе: Дис. … канд. мед. наук. М., 1994.
3. Михайловский М.В., Фомичев Н.Г., Новиков В.В. и др. Инструментарий Cotrel -Dubousset в хирургии идиопатическогосколиоза // Вестник травматол. и ортопед. им. Н.Н. Приорова. 1999. № 2. С. 3-7.
4. Пыжевская О.П., Орехова Н.М. Некоторые аспекты психологического состоянияи самооценки пациентов со сколиозом, находящихся на лечении в специализированной школе-интернате // Адаптация различных систем организма при сколиотической деформации позвоночника: Методы лечения: Тез. докл. Междунар. симпозиума. М., 2003. С. 90-93.
5. Стоков Л.Д. Отдаленные результаты хирургического лечения больных сколиозом: Автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. М., 1979.
6. Asher M., Lai S.M., Burton D., et al. Discrimination validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire: Relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size // Spine. 2003. Vol. 28. P. 74-78.
7. Asher M., Lai S.M., Burton D., et al. Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire: Responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment // Spine. 2003. Vol. 28. P. 70-73.
8. Asher M., Lai S.M., Burton D., et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the SRS-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis // Spine. 2003. Vol. 28. P. 63-69.
9. Asher M.A., Lai S.M., Burton D. Further development and validation of the SRS outcome instrument // Spine. 1993. Vol. 18. P. 2381-2386.
10. Birch J.G., Herring J.A., Roach J.W., et al. Cotrel - Dubousset instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis - a preliminary report // Clin. Orthop. 1988. N 227. P. 24-29.
11. Booth K.C., Bridwell K.H., Lenke L.G. Complication and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance) // Spine. 1999. Vol. 24. P. 1712-1720.
12. Bridwell K.H., Shufflebarger H.L., Lenke L.G. Parentals’ and patients’ preferences and concerns in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional preoperative analysis // Spine. 2000. Vol. 25. P. 2392-2399.
13. Burton D.S., Asher M.A., Lai S.M. Patient-based outcome analysis of patients with single torsion thoracolumbar-lumbar scoliosis treated with anterior or posterior instrumentation // Spine. 2002. Vol. 27. P. 2363-2367.
14. Connolly P.J., Von Schroerder H.P., Johnson G.E. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: long-term effect of instrumentation extending to the lumbar spine // J. Bone Jt Surg. Am. 1995. Vol. 77. P. 1210-1216.
15. D’Andrea L.P., Betz R.R., Lenke L.G., et al. Do radiographic parameters correlate with clinical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? // Spine. 2000. Vol. 25. P. 1795-1802.
16. Edgar M.A., Mehta M.H. Long-term follow-up of fused and unfused idiopathic scoliosis // J. Bone Jt Surg. Br. 1988. Vol. 70. P. 712-716.
17. Goldberg M.S., Mayo N.E., Poitras B. The Ste-Justine adolescent idiopathic scoliosis cohort study: part II. Perception of health, self and body image, and participation in physical activities // Spine. 1994. Vol. 19. P. 1562-1572.
18. Haher T.R., Gorup J.M., Shin T.M. Results of the scoliosis research society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter study of 244 patients // Spine. 1999. Vol. 24. P. 1435-1440.
19. Koch K.D., Buchanan R., Birch J.G. Adolescents undergoing surgery for idiopathic scoliosis: how physical and psychological characteristics relate to patient satisfaction with the cosmetic result // Spine. 2001. Vol. 26. P. 2119-2124.
20. Large D.F., Doig W.G., Dickens D.R., et al. Surgical treatment of double major scoliosis. Improvement of the lumbar curve after fusion of the thoracic curve // J. Bone Jt Surg. Br. 1991. Vol. 73. P. 121-124.
21. Luk K., Lee F., Leong J. The effect on the lumbosacral spine of long spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis: a minimum 10-year follow-up // Spine. 1987. Vol. 12. P. 996-1000.
22. Merola A.A., Haher T.R., Brkaric M., et al. A multicenter study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis using the SRS outcome instrument // Spine. 2002. Vol. 27. P. 2046-2051.
23. Moen K.Y., Nachemson A.L. Treatment of scoliosis: A historical perspective // Spine. 1999. Vol. 24. P. 2570-2575.
24. Perez-Grueso F.S., Fernandez-Baillo N., Arauz de Robles S. The low lumbar spine below CDI: Long-term findings // Spine. 2000. Vol. 25. P. 2333-2341.
25. Pratt R.K., Burwell R.G., Cole A.A. et al. Patient and parental perception of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis before and after surgery in comparison with surface and radiographic measurements // Spine. 2002. Vol. 27. P. 1534-1552.
26. Wilson P.L., Newton P.O., Wenger D.R. et al. A multicenter study analyzing the relationship of a standardized radiographic scoring system of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis and the Scoliosis Research Society outcome instrument // Spine. 2002. Vol. 27. P. 2036-2040.
Review
For citations:
Vetrile S.T., Kisel A.A., Kuleshov A.A. ASSESSMENT OF CHANGES IN SELF-ESTIMATION, QUALITY OF LIFE AND PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH CDI SURGICAL CORRECTION FOR DYSPLASTIC SCOLIOSIS. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2004;(2):40-44. (In Russ.)