POSTERIOR AND ANTERIOR DECOMPRESSION-STABILIZATION SURGERY FOR ONE-LEVEL COMBINED LATERAL LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS
https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2012.1.54-61
Abstract
Objective. To evaluate therapeutic feasibility of posterior and anterior decompression-stabilization operations for combined lateral stenosis in the lumbar spine.
Material and Methods. Prospective randomized controlled trial included review of medical records of 96 patients using the method of continuous sampling. Patients with radicular compression syndrome caused by combined lateral stenosis of the lumbar spine were treated in accordance with a single protocol in three specialized neurosurgical clinics. Patients in the first group (n = 47) underwent posterior decompression-stabilization operations with posterior foraminotomy, and patients in the second group (n = 49) - anterior decompression-stabilization operations with anterior foraminotomy.
Results. Assessment of changes in functional ability (Oswestry scale), pain (VAS), and neurological symptoms showed comparable results of posterior and anterior decompression-stabilization procedures in both groups.
Conclusion. Combined lateral stenosis with a prevalence of anterior localization of compression substrates should be preferably treated by anterior decompression-stabilization operation with anterior foraminotomy, whereas the prevalence of posterior root compression by articular processes entophytes or migrating disc herniation requires posterior decompression-stabilization operation.
About the Authors
A. A. LutsikRussian Federation
A. G. Yepifantsev
Russian Federation
A. V. Krutko
Russian Federation
E. B. Kolotov
Russian Federation
R. R. Aminov
Russian Federation
G. Y. Bondarenko
Russian Federation
References
1. Радченко В.А. Алгоритмы выбора оптимального оперативного вмешательства при различных клинических вариантах поясничного остеохондроза // Вертебрология - проблемы, поиски, решения: Тез. докл. науч.-практ. конф. М., 1998. С. 151-152.
2. Руцкий А.В., Шанько Г.Г. Нейроортопедические и ортопедоневрологические синдромы у детей и подростков. Минск, 1998.
3. Холин А.В., Макаров А.Ю., Мазуркевич Е.А. Магнитная резонансная томография позвоночника и спинного мозга. СПб., 1995.
4. Abumi К, Panjabi MM, Kramer KM, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal stability after graded facetectomies. Spine. 1990;15:1142-1147.
5. Berney J. [Epidemiology of narrow spinal canal]. Neurochirurgie. 1994;40:174-178. In French.
6. Boden SD, Martin C, Rudolph R, et al. Increase of motion between lumbar vertebrae after excision of the capsule and cartilage of the facets. A cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:1847-1853.
7. Bundschuh CV. Imaging of the ostoperative lumbosacral spine. Neuroimag Clin North Am. 1993;3: 499-516.
8. Cornefjord M, Byrod G, Brisby H, et al. A longterm (4- to 12-year) follow-up study of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J. 2000;9: 563-570.
9. Davis RA. A long-term outcome analysis of 984 surgically treated herniated lumbar discs. J Neurosurg. 1994;80:415-421.
10. Epstein JA, Epstein BS, Rosenthal AD, et al. Sciatica caused by nerve root entrapment in the lateral recess: the superior facet syndrome. J Neurosurg. 1972;36:584-589.
11. Franklin GM, Haug J, Heyer NJ, et al. Outcome of lumbar fusion in Washington State worker’s compensation. Spine. 1994;19:1897-1904.
12. Jonsson B, Annertz M, Sjoberg C, et al. A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Five-year follow-up by an independent observer. Spine. 1997;22:2938-2944.
13. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Lew RA, et al. Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes. Spine. 1997;22:1123-1131.
14. Kleinstueck FS, Diederich CJ, Nau WH, et al. Acute biomechanical and histological effects of intradiscal electrothermal therapy on human lumbar discs. Spine. 2001;26:2198-2207.
15. Mullin BB, Rea GL, Irsik R, et al. The effect of postlaminectomy spinal instability on the outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis patients. J Spinal Disord. 1996;9:107-116.
16. Niosi CA, Wilson DC, Zhu Q, et al. The effect of dynamic posterior stabilization on facet joint contact forces: an in vitro investigation. Spine. 2008; 33:19-26.
17. Pintar FA, Cusick JF, Yoganandan N, et al. The biomechanics of lumbar facetectomy under compression- flexion. Spine. 1992;17:804-810.
18. Postacchini F, Cinotti G, Perugia D, et al. The surgical treatment of central lumbar stenosis. Multiple laminotomy compared with total laminectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:386-392.
19. Rigby MC, Selmon GP, Foy MA, et al. Graft ligament stabilisation: mid-to long-term follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2001;10:234-236.
20. Rohlmann A, Burra NK, Zander T, et al. Comparision of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:1223-1231.
21. Siebert E, Prüss H, Klingebiel R, et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis: syndrome, diagnostics and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol. 2009;5:392-403.
22. Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O. The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multicenter study of a novel non fusion system. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(Suppl 2):S170-S178.
23. Vaccaro AR, Ball ST. Indications for instrumentation in degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. Orthopedics. 2000;23:260-271.
24. Wurgler-Hauri CC, Kalbarczyk A, Wiesli M, et al. Dynamic neutralization of the lumbar spine after microsurgical decompression in acquired lumbar spinal stenosis and segmental instability. Spine. 2008;33:E66-E72.
25. Yanase M, Sakou T, Taketomi E, et al. Transpedicular fixation of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine with screws. Application of the Diapason system. Paraplegia. 1995;33:216-218.
Review
For citations:
Lutsik A.A., Yepifantsev A.G., Krutko A.V., Kolotov E.B., Aminov R.R., Bondarenko G.Y. POSTERIOR AND ANTERIOR DECOMPRESSION-STABILIZATION SURGERY FOR ONE-LEVEL COMBINED LATERAL LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2012;(1):54-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2012.1.54-61