Vertebral syndrome in consequences of spina bifida: clinical features and treatment
https://doi.org/10.14531/2018.4.107-114
Abstract
The guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of vertebral pathology in patients with the consequences of spina bifida are presented for discussion among professional groups before their adoption. The guidelines are based on the literature data and the authors’ own experience. The purpose of the study is algorithmization of treatment, the material is presented mainly in the form of tables
About the Authors
S. O. Ryabykh
Russian Ilizarov Scientific Center for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
DMSc, Head of the Clinic of Spine Pathology and Rare Diseases
Marii Ulyanovoy str., 6, Kurgan, 640014
A. Yu. Mushkin
St. Petersburg Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
DMSc, Prof., chief researcher
Politekhnicheskaya str., 32, St. Petersburg, 194064
D. M. Savin
Russian Ilizarov Scientific Center for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, head of traumatologic-orthopedic department No. 9 of the Clinic of Spine Pathology and Rare Diseases
Marii Ulyanovoy str., 6, Kurgan, 640014
References
1. Siegel MJ. Ultrassonografia Pediatrica. 3rd ed. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Guanabara Koogan, 2003:37–108.
2. Lindseth RE. Myelomeningocele spine. In: Weinstein SL (ed.), The Pediatric Spine: Principles and Practice. Vol. 2. New York: Raven Press, 1994:1043–1067.
3. Ульрих Э.В., Мушкин А.Ю., Губин А.В. Вертебральная патология в синдромах. Новосибирск, 2016. [Ulrikh EV, Mushkin AYu, Gubin AV. Vertebral Pathology in Syndromes. Novosibirsk, 2016. In Russian].
4. Rogala EJ, Drummond DS, Gurr J. Scoliosis: incidence and natural history. A prospective epidemiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:173–176. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-197860020-00005.
5. Федеральная служба государственной статистики. Официальная статистика/Население/Здравоохранение. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/population/healthcare. [Federal Service of State Statistics. Official statistics/Population/Healthcare. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/population/healthcare. In Russian].
6. Ваккасов Н.Й., Ахмедиев М.М. Роль алгоритма диагностики при лечении детей с врожденными спинно-мозговыми грыжами // Нейрохирургия и неврология детского возраста. 2015. № 2 (44). С. 55–60. [Vakkasov NY, Akhmediev MM. The role of the diagnostic algorithm and treatment of children with congenital spina bifida. Pediatric Neurosurgery and Neurology. 2015;(2):55–60. In Russian].
7. Parisini P, Greggi T, Di Silvestre M, Giardina F, Bakaloudis G. Surgical treatment of scoliosis in myelomeningocele. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;91:442–447. DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-935-6-442.
8. Park TS, Cail WS, Maggio WM, Mitchell DC. Progressive spasticity and scoliosis in children with myelomeningocele: Radiological investigation and surgical treatment. J Neurosurg. 1985;62:367–375. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1985.62.3.0367.
9. Tachdijian MO. Myelomeningocele/scoliosis. In: Pediatric Orthopaedics. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1990:1843–1848.
10. Trivedi J, Thomson JD, Slakey JB, Banta JV, Jones PW. Clinical and radiographic predictors of scoliosis in patients with myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1389–1394. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200208000-00014.
11. Eysel P, Hopf C, Schwarz M, Voth D. Development of scoliosis in myelomeningocele. Differences in the history caused by idiopathic pattern. Neurosurg Rev. 1993;16:301–306. DOI: 10.1007/BF00383841.
12. Guille JT, Sarwark JF, Sherk HH, Kumar SJ. Congenital and developmental deformities of the spine in children with myelomeningocele. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:294-302. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200605000-00005.
13. Carstens C, Koch H, Brocai DR, Niethard FU. Development of pathological lumbar kyphosis in myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:945–950.
14. Ryabykh SO, Pavlova OM, Savin DM, Burtsev AV, Gubin AV. Surgical management of myelomeningocele-related spinal deformities. World Neurosurg. 2018;112:e431–e441. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.058.
15. Kahanovitz N, Duncan JW. The role of scoliosis and pelvic obliquity on functional disability in myelomeningocele. Spine. 1981;6:494–497. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198109000-00012.
16. Muller EB, Nordwall A, Oden A. Progression of scoliosis in children with myelomeningocele. Spine. 1994;19:147–150.
17. Hudgins RJ, Gilreath CL. Tethered spinal cord following repair of myelomeningocele. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;16:E7. DOI: 10.3171/foc.2004.16.2.8.
18. Herman JM, McLone DG, Storrs BB, Dauser RC. Analysis of 153 patients with myelomeningocele or spinal lipoma reoperated upon for a tethered cord. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1993;19:243–249. DOI: 10.1159/000120739.
19. Sarwark JF, Weber DT, Gabrieli AP, McLone DG, Dias L. Tethered cord syndrome in low motor level children with myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1996;25:295–301. DOI: 10.1159/000121143.
20. Bowman RM, Mohan A, Ito J, Seibly JM, McLone DG. Tethered cord release: a long-term study in 114 patients: Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009;3:181–187. DOI: 10.3171/2008.12.PEDS0874.
21. Dias MS. Neurosurgical causes of scoliosis in patients with myelomeningocele: an evidence-based literature review. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2005;103:24–35. DOI: 10.3171/ped.2005.103.1.0024.
22. Samuelsson L, Skoog M. Ambulation in patients with myelomeningocele: a multivariate statistical analysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1988;8:569–575.
23. Sharma S, Wu C, Andersen T, Wang Y, Hansen ES, Bunger CE. Prevalence of complications in neuromuscular scoliosis surgery: a literature meta-analysis from the past 15 years. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:1230–1249. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2542-2.
24. Samdani AF, Fine AL, Sagoo SS, Shah SC, Cahill PJ, Clements DH, Betz RR. A patient with myelomeningocele: is untethering necessary prior to scoliosis correction? Neurosurg Focus.2010;29:E8. DOI: 10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1072.
25. Yuan N, Fraire JA, Margetis MM, Skaggs DL, Tolo VT, Keens TG. The effect of scoliosis surgery on lung function in the immediate postoperative period. Spine. 2005;30:2182–2185. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000181060.49993.4a.
26. Wai EK, Owen J, Fehlings D, Wright JG. Assessing physical disability in children with spina bifida and scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20:765–770. DOI: 10.1097/00004694-200011000-00013.
27. Wai EK, Young NL, Feldman BM, Badley EM, Wright JG. The relationship between function, self-perception, and spinal deformity: implications for treatment of scoliosis in children with spina bifida. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25:64–69. DOI: 10.1097/00004694-200501000-00015.
28. Sharma S, Wu C, Andersen T, Wang Y, Hansen ES, Bunger CE. Prevalence of complications in neuromuscular scoliosis surgery: a literature meta-analysis from the past 15 years. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:1230–1249. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2542-2.
29. Губин А.В., Корюков А.А., Резник А.В., Рябых С.О., Савин Д.М., Михайлов А.Г., Мухтяев С.В., Пухов С.П. Комплексное лечение пациентки с множественными пороками развития с применением оперативного лечения и протезирования // Гений ортопедии. 2016. № 1. С. 40–43. DOI 10.18019/1028-4427-2016-1-40-43. [Gubin AV, Koryukov AA, Reznik A., Ryabykh SO, Savin DM, Mikhaylov AG, Mukhtyaev SV, Pukhov SP. Complex treatment of a female patient with multiple developmental abnormalities using surgical intervention and prosthetics/ orthotics. Genij Ortopedii. 2016;(1):40–43. In Russian].
30. Boemers TM, Soorani-Lunsing IJ, de Jong TP, Pruijs HE. Urological problems after surgical treatment of scoliosis in children with myelomeningocele. J Urol. 1996;155:1066–1069.
31. Wild A, Haak H, Kumar M, Krauspe R. Is sacral instrumentation mandatory to address pelvic obliquity in neuromuscular thoracolumbar scoliosis due to myelomeningocele? Spine. 2001;26:E325–E329. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200107150-00019.
32. Maloney WJ, Rinsky LA, Gamble JG. Simultaneous correction of pelvic obliquity, frontal plane, and sagittal plane deformities in neuromuscular scoliosis using a unit rod with segmental sublaminar wires: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop. 1990;10:742–749.
33. Rodgers WB, Williams MS, Schwend RM, Emans JB. Spinal deformity in myelodysplasia. Correction with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine. 1997;22:2435–2443.
34. Smith JT, Novais E. Treatment of Gibbus deformity associated with myelomeningocele in the young child with use of the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR): a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2211-2215. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00856.
35. Guille JT, Betz RR, Balsara RK, Mulcahey MJ, D’Andrea LP, Clements DH. The feasibility, safety, and utility of vertebral wedge osteotomies for the fusionless treatment of paralytic scoliosis. Spine. 2003;28:S266–S274. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092485.40061.ED.
36. Cardoso M, Keating RF. Neurosurgical management of spinal dysraphism and neurogenic scoliosis. Spine. 2009;34:1775–1782. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b07914.
37. Drummond DS, Moreau M, Cruess RL. The results and complications of surgery for the paralytic hip and spine in myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1980;62:49–53.
38. Hatlen T, Song K, Shurtleff D, Duguay S. Contributory factors to postoperative spinal fusion complications for children with myelomeningocele. Spine. 2010;35:1294–1299. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bf8efe.
39. Sponseller PD, LaPorte DM, Hungerford MW, Eck K, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG. Deep wound infections after neuromuscular scoliosis surgery: a multicenter study of risk factors and treatment outcomes. Spine. 2000;25:2461–2466. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200010010-00007.
Review
For citations:
Ryabykh S.O., Mushkin A.Yu., Savin D.M. Vertebral syndrome in consequences of spina bifida: clinical features and treatment. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2018;15(4):107-114. https://doi.org/10.14531/2018.4.107-114
Email this article 