Evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical methods for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a cohort retrospective study
https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2021.2.34-43
Abstract
Objective. To compare the effectiveness of surgical methods for treating patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation.
Material and Methods. The sample consisted of 160 patients operated on in 2014–2019 for recurrent lumbar disc herniation by percutaneous endoscopic discectomy (Group 1), microsurgical discectomy (Group 2), single-level transforaminal interbody fusion (Group 3) and single-level total intervertebral disc replacement (Group 4). The effectiveness of surgical treatment was evaluated using the NRS-11, ODI, and MacNab questionnaires.
Results. Assessment of the pain syndrome severity and the vital activity level of patients revealed significant (p < 0.05) differences in favor of total intervertebral disc replacement. Excellent and good outcomes after arthroplasty according to MacNab criteria were noted in all patients in this group. Similar outcomes were reported in 77.5 % (31/40) of patients in the TLIF group, in 75.1 % (24/32) of patients in the percutaneous endoscopic discectomy group and in 72.6 % (45/62) of patients in the microdiscectomy group. The operation time and length of hospital stay were shorter in the endoscopic and microsurgical discectomy groups (p < 0.001). However, the lower incidence of complications and reoperations was observed in groups of posterior interbody fusion and arthroplasty (p > 0.05).
Conclusion. Arthroplasty with the M6-L implant expands the possibilities of surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Total intervertebral disc replacement and posterior interbody fusion for recurrent lumbar disc herniation are more effective in comparison with decompressive operations, which is reflected in the improvement of clinical treatment outcomes, reduction of perioperative complications and frequency of repeated interventions.
About the Authors
M. N. KravtsovRussian Federation
DMSc, senior lecturer of the Department of Neurosurgery; associate professor of the Department of Neurosurgery n.a. prof. AL. Polenov
I. A. Kruglov
Russian Federation
Head of Neurosurgical Department
S. D. Mirzametov
Russian Federation
neurosurgeon in the Clinic of Neurosurgery, lecturer in the Department of Neurosurgery
A. S. Seleznev
Russian Federation
chief resident, Neurosurgical Department
N. P. Alekseyeva
Russian Federation
PhD in Physics and Mathematics, Associate Professor
V. A. Manukovskiy
Russian Federation
DMSc, Prof., Director; Head of the Department of Neurosurgery n.a. prof. AL. Polenov
B. V. Gaidar
Russian Federation
DMSc, Prof, Academician of the RAS, Professor of the Department of Neurosurgery
D. V. Svistov
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, chief neurosurgeon of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation, Head of the Department of Neurosurgery, associate professor
References
1. Lee JS, Kim HS, Pee YH, Jang JS, Jang IT. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar diskectomy and open lumbar microdiskectomy for recurrent lumbar disk herniation. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2018;79:447–452. DOI 10.1055/s-0037-1608870.
2. Eseoglu M, Akdemir H. Failed back surgery syndrome in lomber disc herniation: the retrospectıve analysis of success scorings of epidural fibrosis and recurrent cases in reoperations. Eur J Gen Med. 2010;7:130–135. DOI: 10.29333/ejgm/82839.
3. McGirt MJ, Ambrossi GL, Datoo G, Sciubba DM, Witham TF, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A. Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:338–345. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000337574.58662.E2.
4. Sedighi M, Haghnegahdar A. Lumbar disk herniation surgery: outcome and predictors. Global Spine J. 2014;4:233–244. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1390010.
5. Leven D, Passias PG, Errico TJ, Lafage V, Bianco K, Lee A, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Zhao W, Spratt KF, Morgan TS, Gerling MC. Risk factors for reoperation in patients treated surgically for intervertebral disc herniation: a subanalysis of eight-year SPORT data. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:1316–1325. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01287.
6. Кремер Ю. Заболевания межпозвонковых дисков: пер. с англ. / под общ. ред. проф. В.А. Широкова. М., 2015. [Kraemer Ju. Intervertebral Disc Diseases. Transl. from Engl., ed.by prof. V.A. Shirokov. Moscow, 2015. In Russian].
7. Davis RA. A long-term outcome analysis of 984 surgically treated herniated lumbar discs. J Neurosurg. 1994;80:415–421. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1994.80.3.0415.
8. Luukkonen MT. Medial facetectomy in recurrent lumbar nerve root compression. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:48–51. DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000127702.75711.ae.
9. Fritzell P, Knutsson B, Sanden B, Stromqvist B, Hagg O. Recurrent versus primary lumbar disc herniation surgery: patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Spine Register Swespine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:1978–1984. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3596-8.
10. Osterman H, Sund R, Seitsalo S, Keskimaki I. Risk of multiple reoperations after lumbar discectomy: a population-based study. Spine. 2003;28:621–627. DOI 10.1097/01.BRS.0000049908.15854.ED.
11. Stambough JL. An algorithmic approach to recurrent lumbar disk herniation: evaluation and management. Semin Spine Surg. 2008;20:2–13. DOI: 10.1053/j.semss.2007.11.002.
12. Луцик А.А., Гаврилов И.В., Бондаренко Г.Ю., Епифанцев А.Г., Пеганов А.И. Новые подходы к оперативному лечению рецидивов грыж поясничных межпозвонковых дисков // Хирургия позвоночника. 2015. Т. 12. № 1. С. 36–45. [Lutsik AA, Gavrilov IV, Bondarenko GYu, Epifantsev AG, Peganov AI. New approaches to surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Hir. Pozvonoc. 2015;12(1):36–45. In Russian]. DOI: 10.14531/ss2015.1.36-45.
13. Глухих Д.Л. Результаты артропластики при дегенеративных поражениях поясничного отдела позвоночника // Вопросы нейрохирургии им. Н.Н. Бурденко. 2015. Т. 79. № 1. С. 68–74. [Glukhikh DL. The outcomes of arthroplasty in degenerative lesions in the lumbar spine. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2015;79(1):68–74. In Russian]. DOI: 10.17116/neiro201579168-74.
14. Ботов А.В., Шнякин П.Г., Ермакова И.Е. Сравнительная характеристика эффективности использования различных доступов к сегменту LV–SI поясничного отдела позвоночника при рецидивирующем дегенеративном процессе // Оперативная хирургия и клиническая анатомия. 2017. Т. 1. № 2. С. 13–16. [Botov AV, Shnyakin PG, Ermakova IE. Comparative characteristics of the efficiency of using various accesses to the lumbar spinal segment LV-SI in a recurrent degenerative process. Operativnaya khirurgiya i klinicheskaya anatomiya. 2017;1(2):13–16. In Russian]. DOI: 10.17116/operhirurg20171213-16.
15. Шнякин П.Г., Ботов А.В., Амельченко А.А. Хирургические методы лечения рецидива болевого синдрома при дегенеративной патологии поясничного отдела позвоночника // Анналы клинической и экспериментальной неврологии. 2018. Т. 12. № 3. С. 61–67. [Shnyakin PG, Botov AV, Amelchenko AA. Surgical methods of treatment of back pain syndrome recurrence in the degenerative pathology of the lumbar spine. Annaly klinicheskoy i eksperimentalnoy nevrologii. 2018;12(3):61–67. In Russian]. DOI: 10.25692/ACEN.2018.3.8.
16. Ботов А.В. Передние и дорcальные доступы для стабилизации поясничного отдела позвоночника при рецидивирующем дегенеративном процессе // Российский нейрохирургический журнал им. проф. А.Л. Поленова. 2017. Т. 9. № 1. С. 11–13. [Botov AV. Front and back approaches to stabilize the lumbar spine for patients with recurrent degenerative process. Russian Neurosurgical Journal n.a. Prof. Polenov. 2017;9(1):11–13. In Russian].
17. Park CK. Total disc replacement in lumbar degenerative disc diseases. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2015;58:401–411. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2015.58.5.401.
18. Ritter Lang K, Dressler N, Schatz C, Gossel L. Treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease using a novel, compressible core prosthesis: 24-month results. J Spine. 2013;2:5. DOI: 10.4172/2165-7939.1000147.
19. Lequin MB, Verbaan D, Bouma GJ. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with stand-alone Trabecular Metal cages for repeatedly recurrent lumbar disc herniation and back pain. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20:617–622. DOI: 10.3171/2014.2.SPINE13548.
20. Greenleaf RM, Harris MB, Bono CM. The role of fusion for recurrent disk herniations. Semin Spine Surg. 2011;23:242–248. DOI: 10.1053/j.semss.2011.05.010.
21. Mascarenhas AA, Thomas I, Sharma G, Cherian JJ. Clinical and radiological instability following standard fenestration discectomy. Indian J Orthop. 2009;43:347–351. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.55465.
22. Glenn JS, Yaker J, Guyer RD, Ohnmeiss DD. Anterior discectomy and total disc replacement for three patients with multiple recurrent lumbar disc herniations. Spine J. 2011;11:e1–e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.07.030.
23. Ahn Y, Lee SH, Park WM, Lee HY, Shin SW, Kang HY. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome, and prognostic factors of 43 consecutive cases. Spine. 2004;29:326–332. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000134591.32462.98.
24. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation after conventional discectomy: a prospective, randomized study comparing full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal versus microsurgical revision. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22:122–129. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318175ddb4.
25. Кравцов М.Н., Мирзаметов С.Д., Малаховский В.Н., Алексеева Н.П., Гайдар Б.В., Свистов Д.В. Ближайшие и отдаленные результаты чрескожной видеоэндоскопической и микрохирургической поясничной дискэктомии: когортное проспективное исследование // Хирургия позвоночника. 2019. Т. 16. № 2. С 27–34. [Kravtsov MN, Mirzametov SD, Malakhovskiy VN, Alekseyeva NP, Gaidar BV, Svistov DV. Short- and long-term results of percutaneous full-endoscopic and microsurgical lumbar discectomy: prospective cohort study. Hir. Pozvonoc. 2019;16(2):27–34. In Russian]. DOI: 10.14531/ss2019.2.27-34.
26. Hoogland T, van den Brekel-Dijkstra K, Schubert M, Miklitz B. Endoscopic
27. transforaminal discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a prospective, cohort evaluation of 262 consecutive cases. Spine. 2008;33:973–978. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8ade.
28. Le H, Sandhu FA, Fessler RG. Clinical outcomes after minimal-access surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Neurosurg Focus. 2003;15:1–4. DOI: 10.3171/foc.2003.15.3.12.
29. Lee DY, Shim CS, Ahn Y, Choi YG, Kim HJ, Lee SH. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for recurrent disc herniation. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009;46:515–521. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2009.46.6.515.
30. Lowe TG, Tahernia AD, O’Brien MF, Smith DA. Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): indications, technique, and 2-year results. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002;15:31–38. DOI: 10.1097/00024720-200202000-00005.
31. Choi JY, Choi YW, Sung KH. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in patients with a previous discectomy: minimum 2-year follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:
32. –352. DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000168718.08193.9d.
33. Vishteh AG, Dickman CA. Anterior lumbar microdiscectomy and interbody fusion for the treatment of recurrent disc herniation. Neurosurgery. 2001;48:334–338. DOI 10.1097/00006123-200102000-00018.
Review
For citations:
Kravtsov M.N., Kruglov I.A., Mirzametov S.D., Seleznev A.S., Alekseyeva N.P., Manukovskiy V.A., Gaidar B.V., Svistov D.V. Evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical methods for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a cohort retrospective study. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2021;18(2):34-43. https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2021.2.34-43