Preview

Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika)

Advanced search

Spinopelvic fixation in neurogenic scoliosis: validity of indications

https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2025.1.15-25

Abstract

Objective. Analysis of the results of surgical correction of neuromuscular scoliosis in order to optimize indications for performing spinal and pelvic fixation.

Material and Methods. A total of 45 patients aged 10 to 17 years were operated on for neurogenic scoliosis in the period of 2012–2024. Thirty patients without pelvic fixation were divided into two groups: Group I included 15 patients with pelvic tilt of less than 15°, and Group II – 15 patients with pelvic tilt of more than 15°. Group III consisted of 15 patients with pelvic tilt of more than 15° who underwent pelvic fixation. All patients underwent postural radiographs before and after surgery. The treatment results were assessed according to the following criteria: the frontal pelvic tilt angle according to Maloney, the tilt of the L5 vertebra, and the magnitude of scoliotic curve angle according to Cobb. A search for possible relationships between various radiographic parameters was also performed.

Results. The average value of pelvic tilt before surgery in Group I was 7.9° ± 5.1°, in Group II – 36.3° ± 14.7°, and in Group III – 37.9° ± 14.2°; after surgery in Group I – 5.9° ± 4.5°, in Group II – 13.6° ± 10.4°, and in Group III – 12.8° ± 4.0°. The average degree of correction in groups was 36.8 ± 32.0 %, 61.2 ± 26.8 % and 62.9 ± 8.9 %, respectively. No significant loss of correction was found during long-term follow-up in all groups. The preoperative Cobb angle of the primary curve was 73.3° ± 20.2° in Group I, 99.9° ± 31.0° in Group II, and 96.7° ± 17.5° in Group III. In the postoperative period, the average Cobb angle was 29.4° ± 9.7° in Group I, 40.2° ± 24.9° in Group II, and 41.6° ± 19.5° in Group III. In Group II, a direct relationship was found between the correction of the primary curve and the correction of pelvic tilt. When assessing the relationship between the L5 inclination and the correction of pelvic tilt in Group II, an inverse relationship was found. No reliable relationship was found between the initial angle of pelvic tilt and the correction of pelvic tilt in Group II.

Conclusion. Correction of pronounced pelvic tilt in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis is possible without pelvic fixation and without significant loss of correction, provided that the degree of correction of the primary curve is satisfactory (more than 50 %). A possible parameter determining the need for spinopelvic fixation may be the angle of L5 inclination. Narrowing the indications for inclusion of the pelvis in the fusion zone during surgical correction of neurogenic spinal deformities helps to reduce the frequency of implant-associated complications that are typical for spinopelvic fixation, which in general will lead to a significant increase in the effectiveness of surgical treatment of this category of patients.

About the Authors

A. S. Butenko
National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Andrey Sergeyevich Butenko, traumatologist-orthopedist of the Neuroorthopedic Department with Orthopedics, 

2 build.1 Lomonosovsky Prospect, Moscow, 119991, Russia



I. P. Pimbursky
National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Ivan Petrovich Pimbursky, pediatric surgeon, postgraduate student,

2 build.1 Lomonosovsky Prospect, Moscow, 119991, Russia



O. B. Chelpachenko
National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health; Research Institute of Emergency Children’s Surgery and Traumatology
Russian Federation

Oleg Borisovich Chelpachenko, DMSc, chief researcher of the Laboratory for scientific foundations of neuroorthopedics and orthopedics, Professor of the Department of pediatric surgery with a course in anesthesiology and resuscitation, traumatologist-orthopedist of the Neuroorthopedic Department with Orthopedics, 

2 build.1 Lomonosovsky Prospect, Moscow, 119991, Russia;

Head of the Department of Traumatology and Disaster Medicine,

22 Bolshaya Polyanka str., Moscow, 119180, Russia, 



K. A. Samokhin
Orenburg Regional Clinical Center for Surgery and Traumatology
Russian Federation

Konstantin Aleksandrovich Samokhin, traumatologist-orthopedist of the Department of elective traumatology, 

11 Postnikova str., Orenburg, 460000, Russia



K. V. Zherdev
National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Konstantin Vladimirovich Zherdev, DMSc, associate professor, chief researcher of the Laboratory of Scientific Foundations of Neuroorthopedics and Orthopedics, head of the Neuroorthopedic Department with Orthopedics

2 build.1 Lomonosovsky Prospect, Moscow, 119991, Russia



S. P. Yatsyk
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Russian Federation

Sergey Pavlovich Yatsyk, DMSc, professor of the Department of Pediatric Surgery n.a. acad. S.Ya. Doletsky

2/1-1 Barrikadnaya str., Moscow, 125993, Russia



A. P. Petelguzov
National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Alexandr Aleksandrovich Petelguzov, traumatologist-orthopedist of the Neuroorthopedic Department with Orthopedics

2 build.1 Lomonosovsky Prospect, Moscow, 119991, Russia



P. A. Zubkov
National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Pavel Andreyevich Zubkov, MD, PhD, senior researcher of the Laboratory of scientific foundations of neuroorthopedics and orthopedics, associate professor of the Department of pediatric surgery with a course in anesthesiology and resuscitation

2 build.1 Lomonosovsky Prospect, Moscow, 119991, Russia



References

1. Vialle R, Thévenin-Lemoine C, Mary P. Neuromuscular scoliosis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(1 Suppl):S124–S139. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.11.002

2. Funk S, Lovejoy S, Mencio G, Martus J. Rigid instrumentation for neuromuscular scoliosis improves deformity correction without increasing complications. Spine. 2016;41:46–52. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001170

3. Persson-Bunke M, Hägglund G, Lauge-Pedersen H, Wagner P, Westbom L. Scoliosis in a total population of children with cerebral palsy. Spine. 2012;37:E708–E713. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318246a962

4. Murphy RF, Mooney JF 3rd. Current concepts in neuromuscular scoliosis. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019;12:220–227. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-019-09552-8

5. Rumalla K, Yarbrough CK, Pugely AJ, Koester L, Dorward IG. Spinal fusion for pediatric neuromuscular scoliosis: national trends, complications, and in-hospital outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25:500–508. DOI:10.3171/2016.2.SPINE151377

6. Hasler C, Brunner R, Grundshtein A, Ovadia D. Spine deformities in patients with cerebral palsy; the role of the pelvis. J Child Orthop. 2020;14:9–16. DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.190141

7. Farshad M, Weber S, Spirig JM, Betz M, Haupt S. Pelvic fixation in surgical correction of neuromuscular scoliosis. N Am Spine Soc J. 2022;10:100123. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100123

8. Miyanji F, Nasto LA, Sponseller PD, Shah SA, Samdani AF, Lonner B, Yaszay B, Clements DH, Narayanan U, Newton PO. Assessing the risk-benefit ratio of scoliosis surgery in cerebral palsy: surgery is worth it. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100:556–563. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00621

9. Modi HN, Suh SW, Song HR, Yang JH, Jajodia N. Evaluation of pelvic fixation in neuromuscular scoliosis: a retrospective study in 55 patients. Int Orthop. 2010;34:89–96. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-008-0703-z

10. McCall RE, Hayes B. Long-term outcome in neuromuscular scoliosis fused only to lumbar 5. Spine. 2005;30:2056–2060. DOI:10.1097/01.brs.0000178817.34368.16

11. Dayer R, Ouellet JA, Saran N. Pelvic fixation for neuromuscular scoliosis deformity correction. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2012;5:91–101. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-012-9122-2

12. Nielsen E, Andras LM, Bellaire LL, Fletcher ND, Minkara A, Vitale MG, Troy M, Glotzbecker M, Skaggs DL. Don’t you wish you had fused to the pelvis the first time: a comparison of reoperation rate and correction of pelvic obliquity. Spine. 2019;44:E465–E469. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002888

13. Myung KS, Lee C, Skaggs DL. Early pelvic fixation failure in neuromuscular scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015;35:258–265. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000254

14. Li Y, Swallow J, Gagnier J, Smith JT, Murphy RF, Sponseller PD, Cahill PJ. Pelvic fixation is not always necessary in children with cerebral palsy scoliosis treated with growth-friendly instrumentation. Spine Deform. 2022;10:925–932. DOI: 10.1007/s43390-022-00474-z

15. Sponseller PD, Zimmerman RM, Ko PS, Pull Ter Gunne AF, Mohamed AS, Chang TL, Kebaish KM. Low profile pelvic fixation with the sacral alar iliac technique in the pediatric population improves results at two-year minimum follow-up. Spine. 2010;35:1887–1892. DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e03881

16. Shrader MW, Andrisevic EM, Belthur MV, White GR, Boan C, Wood W. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of pelvic obliquity measurement methods in patients with cerebral palsy. Spine Deform. 2018;6:257–262. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.10.001

17. Челпаченко О.Б., Бутенко А.С., Жердев К.В., Солодовникова Е.Н., Зубков П.А., Самохин К.А., Петельгузов А.А., Овечкина А.А., Тимофеев И.В. Способ хирургической коррекции наклона таза у детей при нервно-мышечном и синдромальном сколиозе. Патент на изобретение RU 2804846 C1, опубл. 06.10.2023. Бюл. № 28. [Chelpachenko OB, Butenko AS, Zherdev KV, Solodovnikova EN, Zubkov PA, Samokhin KA, Petelguzov AA, Ovechkina AA, Timofeev IV. Method for surgical correction of pelvic tilt in children with neuro-muscular and syndromal scoliosis. Patent RU 2804846 C1, publ. 06.10.2023. Bul. 28].

18. Takaso M, Nakazawa T, Imura T, Fukuda M, Takahashi K, Ohtori S. Segmental pedicle screw instrumentation and fusion only to L5 in the surgical treatment of flaccid neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine. 2018;43:331–338. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000996

19. Tøndevold N, Lastikka M, Andersen T, Gehrchen M, Helenius I. Should instrumented spinal fusion in nonambulatory children with neuromuscular scoliosis be extended to L5 or the pelvis? Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B:261–267. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0772.R2

20. Luk KD, Ho HC, Leong JC. The iliolumbar ligament. A study of its anatomy, development and clinical significance. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68:197–200. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.68B2.3958002

21. Smucker JD, Miller F. Crankshaft effect after posterior spinal fusion and unit rod instrumentation in children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21:108–112. DOI: 10.1097/00004694-200101000-00021

22. Wild A, Haak H, Kumar M, Krauspe R. Is sacral instrumentation mandatory to address pelvic obliquity in neuromuscular thoracolumbar scoliosis due to myelomeningocele? Spine. 2001;26:E325–E329. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200107150-00019

23. Frischhut B, Krismer M, Stoeckl B, Landauer F, Auckenthaler T. Pelvic tilt in neuromuscular disorders. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2000;9:221–228. DOI:10.1097/01202412-200010000-00003

24. Shillingford JN, Laratta JL, Tan LA, Sarpong NO, Lin JD, Fischer CR, Lehman RA Jr, Kim YJ, Lenke LG. The free-hand technique for S2-alar-iliac screw placement: a safe and effective method for sacropelvic fixation in adult spinal deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100:334–342. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00052

25. Lee MC. S2-alar-iliac screw placement: Who needs imaging? Commentary on an article by Jamal N. Shillingford, MD, et al.: “The free-hand technique for S2-alar-iliac screw placement. a safe and effective method for sacropelvic fixation in adult spinal deformity”. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100:e25. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01164

26. Ray WZ, Ravindra VM, Schmidt MH, Dailey AT. Stereotactic navigation with the O-arm for placement of S-2 alar iliac screws in pelvic lumbar fixation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;18:490–495. DOI: 10.3171/2013.2.SPINE12813


Review

For citations:


Butenko A.S., Pimbursky I.P., Chelpachenko O.B., Samokhin K.A., Zherdev K.V., Yatsyk S.P., Petelguzov A.P., Zubkov P.A. Spinopelvic fixation in neurogenic scoliosis: validity of indications. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2025;22(1):15-25. https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2025.1.15-25



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1810-8997 (Print)
ISSN 2313-1497 (Online)