CONTINUOUS INTRALESIONAL ANALGESIA AFTER SPINE RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH TUBERCULOUS SPONDYLITIS
https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2014.2.74-78
Abstract
Objective. To assess the efficacy of postoperative continuous intralesional analgesia in patients with tuberculous spondylitis.
Material and Methods. Patients (n = 56) with tuberculous spondylitis undergoing radical reconstructive spinal surgery were randomized into two groups depending on the type of post-operative analgesia: standard parenteral analgesia in Group I, and continuous intralesional infusion with local anesthetic in Group II. The amount of administered narcotic and non-narcotic analgesics was evaluated with formalized Analgesic Assessment Scale, postoperative activity - with the Patient Activity Scale, and pain intensity - with the VAS. Side effects of analgesic therapy were registered.
Results. Statistical analysis revealed reliable differences in terms of the assessed analgesic amounts, VAS indexes and frequency of side effects between groups. Results in Group I were reliably higher than in Group II.
Conclusion. The study showed efficacy and safety of continuous wound analgesia with infusion of ropivacaine 0.2 % through a special catheter in the early postoperative period.
About the Authors
Olga Nikolayevna PulkinaRussian Federation
Gleb Eduardovich Ulrikh
Russian Federation
Dmitry Vladimirovich Kuklin
Russian Federation
Vladimir Mikhailovich Bragilevsky
Russian Federation
References
1. Айзенберг В.Л., Ульрих Г.Э., Уколов К.Ю. и др. Обезболивание детей после хирургической коррекции сколиотической деформации позвоночника // Анестезиология и реаниматология. 2011. №1. C. 59-62.
2. Айзенберг В.Л., Ульрих Г.Э., Цыпин Л.Е. и др. Регионарная анестезия в педиатрии: монография. СПб., 2011.
3. Ульрих Г.Э., Заболотский Д.В., Малашенко Н.С. Обезболивание послеоперационной раны местным анестетиком в педиатрии. Эфферентная терапия. СПб. 2009. №15. С. 201-203.
4. Хирургическое лечение костно-суставного туберкулеза / Под ред. Ю.Н. Левашева, А.Ю. Мушкина. СПб., 2008.
5. Banks A. Innovations in postoperative pain management: continuous infusion of local anesthetics. AORN J. 2007; 85: 904-914.
6. Bouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, et al. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic guestionnaire (DN4). Pain. 2005; 114: 29-36.
7. Eldor J. Postoperative wound analgesia: a renewed modality? The Journal of NYSORA. 2009; 13: 9-17.
8. Liu SS, Richman JM, Thirlby RC, et al. Efficacy of continuous wound catheters delivering local anesthetic for postoperative analgesia: a quantitative and qualitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 203: 914-932.
9. Reynolds RA, Legakis JE, Tweedie J, et al. Postoperative pain management after spinal fusion surgery: an analysis of the efficacy of continuous infusion of local anesthetics. Clobal Spine J. 2013; 3: 7-14. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1337119.
10. White PF. The changing role of non-opioid analgesic techniques in the management of postoperative pain. Anesth Analg. 2005; 101: S5-S22.
Review
For citations:
Pulkina O.N., Ulrikh G.E., Kuklin D.V., Bragilevsky V.M. CONTINUOUS INTRALESIONAL ANALGESIA AFTER SPINE RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH TUBERCULOUS SPONDYLITIS. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2014;(2):74-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2014.2.74-78