RUSSIAN VERSION OF THE OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX: CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDITY
https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2009.3.93-98
Abstract
Objective. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Russian Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) version 2.1a.
Material and Methods. To validate the translation of the original version of the ODI, the following process was performed: forward and backward translations, expert committee review of the text, creation of a preliminary version, pre-test of the preliminary version, formation of a final version, study of reliability and validity, and submission of the final version and study results to the author.
Results. Adapted Russian version of the ODI is valid. It is recommended to be used in clinical practice and research to measure the level of disability in patients with low back pain.
Conclusion. ODI is one of two commonly used instruments recommended by international scientific community for measurement of disability in patients with low back pain. The study was approved by Prof. J. Fairbank, the author of the ODI.
About the Author
Evgeny Arkadyevich Cherepanov
Central Hospital No.4, Russian Railways Ltd, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Белова А.Н. Шкалы, тесты и вопросники в неврологии и нейрохирургии. М., 2004.
2. Насонова В.А. Боль в нижней части спины – большая медицинская и социальная проблема, методы лечения // Consilium Medicum. 2004. Т. 6. № 8. С. 536–541.
3. Симонович А.Е., Маркин С.П., Байкалов А.А. и др. Лечение дегенеративных поражений поясничного отдела позвоночника с использованием межостистых динамических имплантатов COFLEX и DIAM // Хирургия позвоночника. 2007. № 1. С. 21-28.
4. Beaton D.E., Bombardier C., Guillemin F., et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures // Spine. 2000. Vol. 25. P. 3186–3191.
5. Jeon C.-H., Kim D.J., Kim S.K., et al. Validation in the cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean version of the Oswestry Disability Index // J. Korean Med. Sci. 2006. Vol. 21. P. 1092–1097.
6. Daltroy L.H., Cats-Baril W.L., Katz J.N., et al. The North American Spine Society lumbar spine outcome assessment instrument: reliability and validity tests // Spine. 1996. Vol. 21. P. 741–749.
7. Deyo R.A., Battie M., Beurskens A.J., et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use // Spine. 1998. Vol. 23. P. 2003–2013.
8. Fairbank J.C., Couper J., Davies J.B., et al. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire // Physiotherapy. 1980. Vol. 66. P. 271–273.
9. Fairbank J.C., Pynsent P.B. The Oswestry Disability Index // Spine. 2000. Vol. 25. P. 2940–2952.
10. Fairbank J., Pynsent P.B., Disney S. The Oswestry Disability Index. URL: http://www.orthosurg.org.uk/odi/
11. Fritz J.M., Irrgang J.J. A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale // Phys. Ther. 2001. Vol. 81. P. 776–788.
12. Roland M., Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire // Spine. 2000. Vol. 25. P. 3115–3124.
13. Roland M., Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain // Spine. 1983. Vol. 8. P. 141–144.
14. Roland M., Morris R. A study of the natural history of law-back pain. Part II: development of guidelines for trials of treatment in primary care // Spine. 1983. Vol. 8. P. 145–150.
Review
For citations:
Cherepanov E.A. RUSSIAN VERSION OF THE OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX: CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDITY. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2009;(3):093-098. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2009.3.93-98
Email this article 