MINIMALLY INVASIVE ENDOSCOPIC TECHNIQUE FOR POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION
https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2007.2.62-65
Abstract
Minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with endoscopic technique and special device for this procedure are presented. The technique allows reducing intraoperative injury of paravertebral tissues, primarily muscles, and can improve the treatment results in patients with degenerative diseases of the spine.
About the Authors
Sergey Petrovich Markin
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksandr Evgenyevich Simonovich
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey Aleksandrovich Baikalov
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksandr Vladimirovich Krutko
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitry Mikhailovich Kozlov
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Bagby G.W. Arthrodesis by the distraction-compression method using astainless steel implant // Orthopedics 1988. Vol. 11. P. 931–9344.
2. Cloward R.B. The treatment of ruptured intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion. Indications, operative technique, after care // J. Neurosurg. 1953. Vol. 10. P. 154.
3. Enker P., Steffee A.D. Interbody fusion and instrumentation // Clin Orthop. 1994. Vol. 300. P. 90–101.
4. Gejo R., Matsui H., Kawaguchi Y., et al. Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery // Spine. 1999. Vol. 24. P. 1023–1028.
5. Glazer P.A, Colliou B.S, Klisch S.M, et al. Biomechanical analysis of multilevel fixation methods in the lumbar spine // Spine. 1997. Vol. 22. P. 171–182.
6. Kawaguchi Y., Matsui H., Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis // Spine. 1996. Vol. 21. P. 941–944.
7. Kawaguchi Y., Matsui H., Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Part 2: Histologic and histochemical analyses in humans // Spine. 1994. Vol. 19. P. 2598–2602.
8. Kuslich S.D., Ulstrom C.L., Griffith S.L., Ahern J.W., Dowdle J.D. The Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody fusion: History, techniques and two-year follow-up results of a USA prospective multi-center trial // Spine. 1998. Vol. 11. P. 1267–1279.
9. Mayer T.G., Vanharanta H., Gatchel R.J. Comparison of CT scan muscle measurements and isokinetic trunk strength in postoperative patients. // Spine. 1989. Vol. 14. P. 33–36.
10. McLaughlin M.R., Haid R.W., Rodts G.E., et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion: Indications, techniques, and results // Clin Neurosurg. 2000. Vol. 47. P. 514–527.
11. Rantanen J., Hurme M., Falck B., et al. The lumbar multifidus muscle five years after surgery for a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation // Spine. 1993. Vol. 18. P. 568–574.
12. Sihvonen T., Herno A., Paljiarvi L., et al. Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome // Spine. 1993. Vol. 18. P. 575–581.
13. Styf J.R., Willen J. The effects of external compression by three different retractors on pressure in the erector spine muscles during and after posterior lumbar spine surgery in humans // Spine. 1998. Vol. 23. P. 354–358.
14. Tsantizos A., Baramki H.G., Zeidman, et al. Segmental stability and compressive strength of posterior lumbar interbody fusion implants // Spine. 2000. Vol. 25. P. 1899–1907.
Review
For citations:
Markin S.P., Simonovich A.E., Baikalov A.A., Krutko A.V., Kozlov D.M. MINIMALLY INVASIVE ENDOSCOPIC TECHNIQUE FOR POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2007;(2):062-065. https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2007.2.62-65
Email this article 