SURGICAL APPROACH TO POSTTRAUMATIC THORACIC KYPHOTIC DEFORMITY
https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2005.2.20-29
Abstract
Objective. To define the effective surgical management of posttraumatic kyphotic deformities in the thoracic spine basing on experimental biomechanical and clinical studies
Material and Methods. Experimental biomechanical study was performed in 30 spine specimens. Anterior wedge osteotomy and fixation of a specimen in a kyphotic position modeled kyphotic deformity. Deformity correction with various instrumentation systems was firstly performed by maximal extension of segments adjacent to kyphosis-producing block, and carried on after crossing of intervertebral anatomical structures. Clinical study consisted in X-ray and instrumental examinations of 80 patients operated on for thoracic spine trauma. The magnitude of true posttraumatic deformity was defined as a difference between measured Cobb angle and mean physiological kyphosis value in the studied spine level.
Results. Deformity rigidity, character of spine mobilization at the level of correction and size of posttraumatic deformity are the most significant factors determining the efficacy of thoracic posttraumatic kyphosis correction. The study resulted in defining rational approach to surgical correction of posttraumatic deformities in the thoracic spine.
Conclusion. Minor kyphotic deformities in the thoracic spine are effectively corrected by instrumentation without mobilization of the spine. Large unfixed kyphosis sometimes requires anterior mobilization. Cases with rigid posttraumatic kyphotic deformity should be operated on with combined mobilization of the spine.
About the Authors
Aleksandr Kaisinovich DulaevRussian Federation
Konstantin Alekseyevich Nadulich
Russian Federation
Sergey Viktorovich Vasilevich
Russian Federation
Andrey Vasilyevich Teremshonok
Russian Federation
References
1. Дулаев А.К., Шаповалов В.М., Гайдар Б.В. Закрытые повреждения позвоночника грудной и поясничной локализации. СПб., 2000.
2. Журавлев С.М., Новиков П.Е., Теодоридис К.А. и др. Статистика переломов позвоночника // Проблемы хирургии позвоночника и спинного мозга: Тез. докл. науч. конф. Новосибирск, 1996. С. 129–130.
3. Корнилов Н.В., Усиков В.Д. Повреждения позвоночника: Тактика хирургического лечения. СПб., 2000.
4. An H.S., Simpson J.M., Ebraheim N.A., et al. Low lumbar burst fractures: comparison between conservative and surgical treatments // Orthopedics. 1992. Vol. 15. P. 367–373.
5. Bernhardt M., Bridwell K.H. Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction // Spine. 1989. Vol. 14. Р. 717–721.
6. Faciszewski T., Winter R.B., Lonstein J.E., et al. The surgical and medical perioperative complications of anterior spinal fusion surgery in the thoracic and lumbar spine in adults: А review of 1223 procedures // Spine. 1995. Vol. 20. P. 1592–1599.
7. Karjalainen M., Aho A.J., Katevuo K. Painful spine after stable fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. What benefit from the use of extension brace? // Ann. Chir. Gynaecol. 1991. Vol. 80. P. 45–48.
8. McCormack T., Karaikovic E., Gaines R.W. The load sharing classification of spine fractures // Spine. 1994. Vol. 19. Р. 1741–1744.
9. O'Brien J.P. Early failure of short-segment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures. А preliminary report // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1994. Vol. 76. P. 153–154.
10. Oda I., Abumi K., Lu D., et al. Biomechanical role of the posterior elements, costovertebral joints, and rib cage in the stability of the thoracic spine // Spine. 1996. Vol. 21. Р. 1423–1429.
11. Polly D.W., Klemme W.R., Shawen S. Management options for the treatment of post-traumatic thoracic kyphosis // Semin. Spine Surg. 2000. Vol. 12. Р. 110–116.
12. Vaccaro A.R, Silber J.S. Post-traumatic spinal deformity // Spine. 2001. Vol. 26. Р. S111–118.
Review
For citations:
Dulaev A.K., Nadulich K.A., Vasilevich S.V., Teremshonok A.V. SURGICAL APPROACH TO POSTTRAUMATIC THORACIC KYPHOTIC DEFORMITY. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2005;(2):020-029. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2005.2.20-29