LONG-TERM RESULTS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT INPATIENTS WITH IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS
https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2005.2.41-45
Abstract
Objectives. This study is aimed at assessing the real efficiency of surgery for IS on a long-term basis using three different techniques. A series of 311 patients with IS was operated on (1987–2003) using the instrumentations of Tanchev – Stefanov (TSI) in 286 cases and Cotrel – Dubousset (CDI) in 25 cases. A control group of 50 patients treated with Harrington rods (HI) before 1987 was included for comparative purpose, making a total of 361. To ensure long-term follow-up validity, only the patients operated on till December 31, 1998 (n = 265) were evaluated retrospectively in this study. The implant systems used included HI (n = 50), TSI (n = 190) and CDI (n = 25). Average preoperative coronal angles were 72°, 67° and 79°, respectively. Average follow-up time was 180, 70 and 67 months, respectively. Final clinical and radiological outcomes, bony fusion rate, complication rate, subjective patient appraisal, characteristics of implants applied, effect of thoracoplasty and cost-effectiveness of treatment were assessed.
Results. Final frontal correction obtained was 24.5 % for HI, being significantly lower (p < 0.05) than that in the TSI-group (43 %) and CDI-group (45 %).TSI and CDI revealed statistically equal results (p > 0.05). Sagittal correction was also comparable – 36 % and 34 %, respectively (p > 0.05). Minor derotative effect (4.5°) was found for both instrumenations. Primary bony fusion was achieved in 82 % of HI-group, in 95 % of TSI-group, and in 92 % of CDI-group. Complications were more frequent when using HI (30 %), while the complication rates were lower in TSI-patients (14 %) and CDI (12 %). The subjective patient appraisal of treatment outcome was positive – 82 % for HI, 91 % for TSI, and 92 % for CDI.
Conclusions. TSI and CDI provide equally favourable late results at a lower complication rate as compared to those obtained by using HI.
About the Authors
Panayot TanchevRussian Federation
L. . Stefanov
Russian Federation
Luben Stokov
Russian Federation
Dobrin Dikov
Russian Federation
Assen Dzherov
Russian Federation
Anton Parushev
Russian Federation
L. . Ivanova
Russian Federation
References
1. Танчев П., Цветанов Л., Джеров А. Клинико-статистическа характеристика на оперативно лекуваната идиопатична сколиоза. Медицинска академия, София, 1988.
2. Танчев П., Стефанов Л. // Ортопед. и травматол. 1990. № 1–2. С. 56–59.
3. Танчев П., Стефанов Л. // Ортопед., травматол. и протез. 1991. № 12. С. 19–22.
4. Танчев П., Стоков Л., Стефанов Л., Диков Д., Иванова Л., Джеров А., Парушев А., Уадут Н. Ортопед. и травматол. 1996. № 4. С. 146–153.
5. Cotrel Y., Dubousset J., Guillaumat M. Clin. Orthop. 1988. Vol. 227. P. 10–29.
6. Drummond D., Guadagni J., Keene J.S. et al. // J. Pediatr. Orthop. 1984, Vol. 4. P. 397–402.
7. Dwyer A.R. // Clin. Orthop. 1973. Vol. 93. P. 191–198.
8. Harrington P.R. // J. Bone Jt. Surg. 1962. Vol. 44–A. P. 591–610.
9. Luque E.R. // Clin. Orthop. 1982. Vol. 163. P. 192–198.
10. Resina J., Alves F. // J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 1977. Vol. 59. P. 159–165.
11. Sponseller P.D. Idiopathis Scoliosis. E-Instructional Lecture. The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA, 2003.
12. Tanchev P., Stefanov L. // Orthop. Mitteil. 1991. Vol. 21. N 3. P. 192–193.
13. Tanchev P., Stefanov L., Dikov D. et al. 5th Biannual Conference of ESDS. Birmingham, England, Book of Abstracts. 1994. P. 57.
14. Tanchev P., Stefanov L., Dikov D. 2nd Congress of EFFORT. Munich, Germany, Abstract Book. 1995. P. 209.
15. Tanchev P., Stefanov L., Dikov D. et al. 20th World Congress of SICOT. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Abstract Book. 1996. P. 270.
16. Tanchev P., Stefanov L. // Acta Orthop. Jugosl. 1999. Vol. 30. N 2. P. 87–90.
17. Zielke K., Stunkat R.,Beaujean F. // Archiv Orthop.Unfall-Chir. 1976. Vol. 85. P. 257–264.
Review
For citations:
Tanchev P., Stefanov L., Stokov L., Dikov D., Dzherov A., Parushev A., Ivanova L. LONG-TERM RESULTS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT INPATIENTS WITH IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2005;(2):041-045. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2005.2.41-45