THE EFFECT OF SEGMENTAL PEDICLE SCREW INSTRUMENTATION ON ACTIVELY GROWING SPINE: A LONG-TERM EXPERIMENTAL STUDY*
https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2005.1.105-111
Abstract
Objectives. To determine the biological response of growing spine to rigid segmental fixation. Summary of background data. Pedicle screw is gaining popularity in pediatric deformities. Yet, biological response of actively growing spine to rigid pedicle screw fixation remains unclear.
Methods. Twelve mini pigs in actively growing period were subjected to posterior segmental screw-rod instrumentation spanning 9 levels and creation of experimental scoliosis. There was no attempt of posterior arthrodesis. The pigs were subjected to periodic radiological examinations and were euthanized at 18 months for analysis.
Results. There was no significant fixation failure despite conspicuous growth of the animals. Initial scoliosis of 31 ± 5° was reduced to 27 ± 8° at 18months, but there was no statistical significance (p=0.37). Though there was no change in length of the implant construct, the vertebrae within the instrumented section showed mean longitudinal growth of 6 ± 3 mm (p = 0.000). The growth occurred at expense of the disc spaces that progressively narrowed with time. On necropsy, the instrumented region was completely fused posteriorly with crossing of the osseous traberculae across the former facet joints. Intervertebral discs were severely atrophic in all the discs with occasional spontaneous fusion.
Conclusions. Even in the actively growing spine, the force of growth does not overcome the fixation offered by segmental pedicle screws. Longitudinal growth occurs at the expense of the joint spaces and leads to spontaneous intervertebral fusion. Our results may explain the favorable outcomes in pedicle fixations in pediatric population, showing little implant failure or nonunion.
About the Authors
Won Joong KimRussian Federation
Christine Coillard
Russian Federation
Souad Rhalmi
Russian Federation
Sylvie Charette
Russian Federation
Charles-Hilaire Rivard
Russian Federation
References
1. Adams M.A., McMillan D.W., Green T.P., et al. Sustained loading generates stress concentrations in lumbar intervertebral discs // Spine. 1996; 21: 434–438.
2. Akbarnia B.A., Asher M.A., Hess W.F., et al. Safety of pedicle screw in pediatric patients with scoliosis and kyphosis. Presented at the 31st Annual meeting of the Scoliosis Research. Society, Ottawa, Canada, September 1996.
3. Benzel E.C. Spinal Instrumentation. American Association of Neurological. Surgeons, 1994.
4. Brown C.A., Lenke L.G., Bridwell K.H., et al. Complications of pediatric thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicle screws // Spine. 1998; 23: 1566–1571.
5. Bridwell K.H., Kuklo T.R., Lewis S.J., et al. String test measurement to assess the effect of spinal deformity correction on spinal canal length. Presented at the 35th Annual meeting of the Scoliosis Research Society, Cairns, Australia, October 2000.
6. Fisk J.R., Peterson H.A., Laughlin R., et al. Spontaneous fusion in scoliosis after instrumentation without arthrodesis. J. Pediatr Orthop. 1995; 15: 182–186.
7. Hamill C.L., Lenke L.G., Bridwell K.H., et al. The use of pedicle screw fixation to improve correction in the lumbar spine idiopathic scoliosis. Is it warranted? // Spine. 1996; 21: 1241–1249.
8. Handa T., Ishihara H., Ohshima H., Osada R., Tsuji H., Obata K. Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis and matrix metalloproteinase production in the human lumbar intervertebral disc // Spine. 1997; 22: 1085–1091.
9. Holm S., Nachemson A. Variations in the nutrition of the canine intervertebral disc induced by motion // Spine. 1983; 8: 866–874.
10. Kim K.W., Ha K.Y., Moon M.S. et al. Fate of the facet joints after instrumented intertransverse process fusion. Clin Orthop. 1999; 36: 110–119.
11. Kioschos H.C., Asher M.A., Lark R.G., et al. Overpowering the crankshaft mechanism. The effect of posterior spinal fusion with and without stiff transpedicular fixation on anterior spinal column growth in immature canines // Spine. 1996; 21: 1168–1173.
12. Liljenqvist U.R., Halm H.F., Link T.M. Pedicle screw instrumentation of the thoracic spine in idiopathic scoliosis // Spine. 1997; 22: 2239–2245.
13. Liljenqvist U.R., Link T.M., Halm H.F.Morphometric analysis of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in idiopathic scoliosis // Spine. 2000; 25:.1247–1253.
14. O'Brien M.F., Lenke L.G., Mardjetko S., et al. Pedicle morphology in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is pedicle fixation an anatomically viable technique? // Spine. 2000; 25: 2285–2293.
15. Rivard C.H., Kim W.J., Coillard C., et al. The influence of fixation rigidity on intervertebral joints. An experimental comparison between a rigid and a flexible system. Presented at the 36th Annual meeting of the Scoliosis Research Society, Cleveland, Ohio, September 2001.
16. Suk S.I., Lee C.K., Kim W.J., et al. Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis // Spine. 1995; 20: 1399–1405.
17. Suk S.I., Kim W.J., Kim J.H., et al. Restoration of thoracic kyphosis in the hypokyphotic spine: a comparison between multiple-hook and segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J. Spinal Disord. 1999; 12: 489–495.
18. Suk S.I., Kim W.J., Kim J.H., et al. Pedicle screw fixation in pediatric spinal deformities-results in patients under 10 years old. Presented at the 35th Annual meeting of the Scoliosis Research Society, Cairns, Australia, October 2000.
19. Suk S.I., Kim W.J., Lee S.M., et al. Thoracic pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformities – are they really safe // Spine. 2001; 26: 2049–2057.
20. Smit T.H. The use of a quadruped as an vivo model for the study of the spine – biomechanical considerations. Eur. Spine J. 2002; 11 (2): 137–144.
Review
For citations:
Kim W.J., Coillard Ch., Rhalmi S., Charette S., Rivard Ch. THE EFFECT OF SEGMENTAL PEDICLE SCREW INSTRUMENTATION ON ACTIVELY GROWING SPINE: A LONG-TERM EXPERIMENTAL STUDY*. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2005;(1):105-111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2005.1.105-111