Preview

Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika)

Advanced search

DIFFERENTIAL SURGICAL TREATMENT OF CERVICAL SPINE STENOSIS

https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2006.4.47-54

Abstract

Objectives. To determine the efficacy of various procedures of precise differentiated surgical decompression for elimination of prevailing clinical manifestations of degenerative stenosis depending on a character and localization of morphological changes (degenerative or posttraumatic) in the cervical spine, the expediency and necessity of application of various fixation and stabilization techniques.

Material and Methods. Eighteen patients included in the study were examined for degenerative stenosis in the cervical spine. All of them underwent decompressive surgery. International representative scales were used to estimate results depending on basic clinical syndrome.

Results. The increase in latency and central sensory conduction time (according to somatosensory evoked potentials data) indicates that ischemic compression lesion is mainly caused by dorsal compression. In this case a laminectomy according to Hirabayashi was performed. The increase in central motor latency time (according to central transcranial magnetic stimulation) greater by 30 % than a norm indicates that ischemic lesion is caused by anterior vertebral artery compression. In this case a corporectomy was performed.

Conclusion. Compression lesions in cervical spine stenosis have local ischemic character and correspond to blood supply basin of compromised spinal or segmental artery. There is a correlation of ischemic compression focus localization with a character of electrophysiological conduction and responses. Differential character of surgical decompression provides observation of minimal invasive principles and better neurological restoration of patients.

About the Authors

Artyom Olegovich Gushcha
N.N. Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow
Russian Federation


Ivan Nikolayevich Shevelev
N.N. Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow
Russian Federation


Aleksandr Romanovich Shakhnovich
N.N. Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow
Russian Federation


Vadim Aleksandrovich Safronov
N.N. Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow
Russian Federation


Sergey Olegovich Arestov
N.N. Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow
Russian Federation


References

1. Barker A.T., Freeston I.L., Jalinous R., et al. Magnetic stimulation of the human brain // J. Physiol. 1985. N 369. P. 3

2. Benzel E.C. Biomechanics of spine stabilization: Principles and clinical practice. N. Y.,1995.

3. De Tomasi A. Surgical approaches for spondylotic myelopathy // Materials of 13th WFNS Congress. Marrakesh, 2005. P. 365–370.

4. Delamarter R.B. Surgery of the cervical spine / S.E. Emery, S. Boden, eds. Saunders, 2003. P. 124–135.

5. Delamarter R.B., Smith S. Cervical myelopathy with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament // Spine. 2003. Vol. 22. P. 44–48.

6. Dickman C.A., Marciano Y.M. Barrow Bone Surgery. 1996. Vol. 89. P. 87–97.

7. Dvorak J. Neurophysiologic tests in diagnosis of nerve root compression caused by disc herniation // Spine. 1996. Vol. 21. P. 39S–44S.

8. Emery S.E., Bohlman H.H., et al. Anterior cervical decompression and arthrodesis for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Two to seventeen-year follow-up // J. Bone Surg. Am. 1998. Vol. 80. P. 941–951.

9. Hirabayashi K., Bohlman H.H. Multilevel cervical spondylosis. Laminoplasty versus anterior decompression // Spine. 1995. Vol. 20. P. 1732–1734.

10. Magladery J.W., McDougal D.B. Electrophysiological studies of nerve and reflex activity in normal man I. Identification of certain reflexes in the electromyogram and the conduction velocity of peripheral nerve fibers // Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1950. Vol. 86. P. 265–290.

11. Seichi A., Takeshita K., Ohishi I., et al. Long term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy // Spine. 2001. Vol. 26. P. 479–487.

12. Tomita K., Kawahara N., Toribatake Y., et al. Expansive midline T-saw laminoplasty (modified spinous process-splitting) for the management of cervical myelopathy // Spine. 1998. Vol. 23. P. 32–37.

13. Tsuyama N. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1984. N 184. P. 71–84.

14. Vohanka S., Dvorak J. Motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in cervical spinal stenosis // Presenred at the 40th Congress of the Czech and Slovak Neurophysiology. Brno, 1993.


Review

For citations:


Gushcha A.O., Shevelev I.N., Shakhnovich A.R., Safronov V.A., Arestov S.O. DIFFERENTIAL SURGICAL TREATMENT OF CERVICAL SPINE STENOSIS. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2006;(4):047-054. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2006.4.47-54



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1810-8997 (Print)
ISSN 2313-1497 (Online)