THE ROLE OF THE MAIN RISK FACTORS IN THE EARLY ADJACENT SEGMENT DISEASE DEVELOPMENT IN PATIENTS AFTER LUMBAR FUSION
Abstract
Object. To identify the importance of main risk factors of early development of degenerative changes in adjacent spinal motion segments after the lumbar fusion.
Material and Methods. The study evaluated the treatment results in 354 patients who underwent fusion in the lumbar spine for degenerative-dystrophic disease. Two groups were compared: Group I included 26 patients with clinically significant adjacent segment disease (ASD) which developed during the first year after surgery, and Group II - 24 patients in whom ASD was identified at a later date.
Results. Significant degenerative changes in the overlying intervertebral disc (Pfirrmann grade 4 and higher) were found preoperatively in 16 (61.5 %) patients in Group I. In Group II, such degenerative changes were observed in 3 (12.5 %) patients. Besides, patients in Group I had higher mean index of the difference between pelvic inclination and lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), than patients in Group II (12.2° and 9.3°, respectively). Nine patients in Group I with Pfirrmann grade 4 to 8 degenerative changes demonstrated sagittal imbalance as Positive in 7 cases and Very Positive in 2 cases, according to Schwab classification.
Conclusion. Decompensation of the pre-existing degenerative changes in the conditions of increased load after fusion is crucial in early development of the adjacent segment disease. Patients with degenerative changes in the adjacent levels of grade 4 and higher according to Pfirrmann, as well as patients with PI-LL index more than 11° have a significantly higher risk of early ASD development.
About the Authors
Sergey Vladimirovich MasevninRussian Federation
Dmitry Aleksandrovich Ptashnikov
Russian Federation
Dmitry Arkadyevich Mikhailov
Russian Federation
Oleg Anatolyevich Smekalenkov
Russian Federation
Nikita Sergeyevich Zaborovsky
Russian Federation
Olga Anatolyevna Lapaeva
Russian Federation
Le Yang
Russian Federation
Zabioulah Mooraby
Russian Federation
References
1. Афаунов А.А., Басанкин И.В., Кузьменко А.В., Шаповалов В.К. Анализ причин ревизионных операций при хирургическом лечении больных с поясничными стенозами дегенеративной этиологии // Хирургия позвоночника. 2014. № 1. С. 86-93.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14531/ss2014.1.86-93.
2. Ахадов Т.А., Оноприенко Г.А., Шантырь В.Ю., Кравцов А.К. Магнитно-резонансная томография в диагностике ранних постоперационных осложнений после хирургического лечения дегенерации межпозвонковых дисков // Нейрохирургия. 1999. № 3. С. 19-25.
3. Байкалов А.А., Крутько А.В. Послеоперационные рецидивы болевых синдромов после поясничных дискэктомий. Причины и хирургическая практика // Поленовские чтения: М-лы IX Всерос. науч.-практ. конф. СПб., 2010. С. 105-106.
4. Загородний Н.В., Абакиров М.Д., Доценко В.В. Повторные операции на поясничном отделе позвоночника при дегенеративных заболеваниях // Политравма. 2008. № 3. С. 29-32.
5. Михайлов Д.А., Пташников Д.А., Усиков В.Д., Масевнин С.В., Хао Мэн. Актуальные вопросы лечения дегенеративного сколиоза на современном этапе (обзор зарубежной литературы) // Травматология и ортопедия России. 2014. № 4 (74). С. 127-134.
6. Продан А.И., Перепечай О.А., Колесниченко В.А., Балан С.И., Чернышев А.Г. Осложнения хирургического лечения поясничного спинального стеноза // Хирургия позвоночника. 2009. № 1. С. 31-37.
7. Смекаленков О.А., Усиков В.Д., Пташников Д.А., Фадеев Е.М. Хирургическое лечение кифосколиоза у взрослых // Травматология и ортопедия России. 2008. № 3. С. 110-111.
8. Хао Мэн, Масевнин С.В., Пташников Д.А., Михайлов Д.А. Оценка значимости сагиттального баланса и патологии межпозвонковых дисков в развитии дегенеративных изменений смежных позвоночно-двигательных сегментов после спондилодеза // Фундаментальные исследования. 2014. № 10 (часть 9). С. 1811-1817.
9. Akamaru T, Kawahara N, Tim Yoon S, Minamide A, Su Kim K, Tomita K, Hutton WC. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis. Spine. 2003;28:1560-1566. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000076820.44132.99.
10. Aota Y, Kumano K, Hirabayashi S. Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments after rigid pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. J Spinal Disord. 1995;8:464-473. DOI: 10.1097/00024720-199512000-00006.
11. Bastian L, Lange U, Knop C, Tusch G, Blauth M. Evaluation of the mobility of adjacent segments after posterior thoracolumbar fixation: a biomechanical study. Eur Spine J. 2001;10:295-300. DOI: 10.1007/s005860100278.
12. Brodsky AE, Hendricks RL, Khalil MA, Darden BV, Brotzman TT. Segmental («floating») lumbar spine fusions. Spine. 1989;14:447-450. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198904000-00022.
13. Brodsky AE. Post-laminectomy and post-fusion stenosis of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;(115):130-139. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-197603000-00022.
14. Brunet JA, Wiley LJ. Acquired spondylosis after spinal fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66:720-724.
15. Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Buchowski JM, Daubs MD, Kim Y, Baldus C. Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine. 2007;32:2253-2257.
16. Chow DH, Luk KD, Evans JH, Leong JC. Effects of short anterior lumbar interbody fusion on biomechanics of neighboring unfused segments. Spine. 1996;21:549-555.
17. Cunningham BW, Kotani Y, McNulty PS, Cappuccino A, McAfee PC. The effect of spinal destabilization and instrumentation on lumbar intradiscal pressure: an in vitro biomechanical analysis. Spine. 1997;22:2655-2663. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199711150-00014.
18. Ekman P, Moller H, Shalabi A, Yu YX, Hedlund R. A prospective randomized study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:1175-1186. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0947-3.
19. Etebar S, Cahill DW. Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability. J Neurosurg. 1999;90(2 Suppl):163-169.
20. Harris RI, Wiley JJ. Acquired spondylosis as a sequel to spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1963;45:1159-1170.
21. Hilibrand AS, Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J. 2004;4(6 Suppl):190S-194S. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.007.
22. Kaito T, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Makino T, Fuji T, Yonenobu K. Induction of early degeneration of the adjacent segment after posterior lumbar interbody fusion by excessive distraction of lumbar disc space. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;12:671-679. DOI: 10.3171/2009.12.SPINE08823.
23. Lee CK, Langrana NA. Lumbosacral spinal fusion. A biomechanical study. Spine. 1984;9:574-581.
24. Lee CK. Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine. 1988;13:375-377.
25. Masevnin S, Ptashnikov D, Michaylov D, Meng H, Smekalenkov O, Zaborovskii N. Risk factors for adjacent segment disease development after lumbar fusion. Asian Spine J. 2015;9:239-244. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.2.239.
26. Oda I, Cunningham BW, Buckley RA, Goebel MJ, Haggerty CJ, Orbegoso CM, McAfee PC. Does spinal kyphotic deformity influence the biomechanical characteristics of the adjacent motion segments? An in vivo animal model. Spine. 1999;24:2139-2146.
27. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine. 2004;29:1938-1944. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000137069.88904.03.
28. Rahm MD, Hall BB. Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study. J Spinal Disord. 1996;9:392-400. DOI: 10.1097/00002517-199610000-00005.
29. Rao RD, David KS, Wang M. Biomechanical changes at adjacent segments following anterior lumbar interbody fusion using tapered cages. Spine. 2005;30:2772-2776. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000190813.27468.2d.
30. Rothenfluh DA, Mueller DA, Rothenfluh E, Min K. Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch predisposes to adjacent segment disease after lumbar spinal fusion. Eur Spine J. 2015; 24:1251-1258. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3454-0.
31. Schlegel JD, Smith JA, Schleusener RL. Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions. Spine. 1996;21:970-981. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199604150-00013.
32. Senteler M, Weisse B, Snedeker JG, Rothenfluh DA. Pelvic incidence - lumbar lordosis mismatch results in increased segmental joint loads in the unfused and fused lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2014; 23:1384-1393. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-3132-7.
33. Vaccaro AR, Ball ST. Indications for instrumentation in degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. Orthopedics. 2000; 23: 260-271.
Review
For citations:
Masevnin S.V., Ptashnikov D.A., Mikhailov D.A., Smekalenkov O.A., Zaborovsky N.S., Lapaeva O.A., Yang L., Mooraby Z. THE ROLE OF THE MAIN RISK FACTORS IN THE EARLY ADJACENT SEGMENT DISEASE DEVELOPMENT IN PATIENTS AFTER LUMBAR FUSION. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2016;13(3):60-67.