Preview

Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika)

Advanced search

Comparative analysis of ALIF and TLIF in recurrent L5–S1 intervertebral disc disease

https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2026.1.56-62

Abstract

Objective. To analyze the immediate and long-term results of surgical treatment of recurrent single-level herniated L5–S1 intervertebral disc using the methods of total removal of the affected disc through anterior approach with spondylodesis (ALIF) and discectomy from the posterior approach with transforaminal spondylodesis (TLIF).

Material and Methods. A total of 180 patients (ALIF group – 87, TLIF group – 93) were operated on for recurrent single-level lumbosacral L5–S1 intervertebral disc disease. The average time to recurrence was 3 years ± 5 months.

Results. The average duration of surgery for ALIF was 92±14 min, for TLIF – 120 ± 18 min (p < 0.05). Сomparison of preoperative and postoperative VAS scores showed that pain syndrome reliably regressed almost completely in patients of the ALIF group. In the TLIF group (n = 93), pain syndrome also regressed, but to a lesser extent. Functional assessment according to ODI revealed positive dynamics after surgery in all patients. Despite the positive dynamics in both groups, the difference in the degree of improvement was statistically significant in favor of ALIF (p < 0.05). In accordance with the modified MacNab scale, the overwhelming majority of patients in the ALIF group rated the outcome as excellent, while in the TLIF group – as good. In the ALIF and TLIF groups, a comparable high percentage of a complete bone block formation was recorded. Insufficient fusion was recorded in four patients. Better restoration of lumbar lordosis was noted in the ALIF group. The average increase in the lordosis angle in the ALIF group was 11.5° ± 2.1°, in the TLIF group – 3.9° ± 0.8° (p < 0.01).

Conclusion. ALIF and TLIF are effective methods of surgical treatment for recurrent single-level L5–S1 intervertebral disc disease. Despite the technical complexity and certain limitations of the anterior approach, ALIF can be considered as a preferred surgical approach for recurrent L5–S1 disc herniation, especially in patients with sagittal profile abnormalities, severe pain, and the need to restore the height of the intervertebral space.

About the Authors

Sh. Kh. Gizatullin
Main Military Clinical Hospital n.a. N.N. Burdenko, Moscow, Russia; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Shamil Khambalovich Gizatullin, MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)



N. A. Pestov
Main Military Clinical Hospital n.a. N.N. Burdenko, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Nikolai Aleksandrovich Pestov



I. S. Lysenko
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Ivan Stanislavovich Lysenko; 6 Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, Russia, 117198



V. Yu. Kurnosenko
Main Military Clinical Hospital n.a. N.N. Burdenko, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Viacheslav Yuryevich Kurnosenko



I. P. Dubinin
Main Military Clinical Hospital n.a. N.N. Burdenko, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Ilya Petrovich Dubinin



M. T. Sampiev
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Mukhammad Tablikhanovich Sampiev, MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)



References

1. Patel RS, Suh SW, Kang SH, Nam KY, Siddiqui SS, Chang DG, Yang JH. The radiologic and clinical outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion for correction of adult degenerative lumbar deformity. Indian J Orthop. 2019;53:502–509. DOI: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_655_17

2. Xu DS, Walker CT, Godzik J, Turner JD, Smith W, Uribe JS. Minimally invasive anterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6:104. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2018.03.24

3. Гизатуллин Ш.Х., Жуков Д.И., Курносенко В.Ю., Ким Э.А. Сравнительный анализ одноуровневого переднего и заднего спондилодеза при дегенеративных заболеваниях пояснично-крестцового отдела позвоночника. Медицинский вестник ГВКГ им. Н.Н. Бурденко. 2021;(2):46–53. [Gizatullin ShKh, Zhukov DI, Kurnosenko VYu, Kim EA. Comparative analysis of single-level anterior and posterior spinal fusion in degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine. Medical Bulletin of the Main Military Clinical Hospital n.a. N.N. Burdenko. 2021;(2):46–53]. DOI: 10.53652/2782-1730-2021-2-2(4)-46-53 EDN: GUGDJQ

4. Lee N, Kim KN, Yi S, Ha Y, Shin DA, Yoon DH, Kim KS. Comparison of outcomes of anterior, posterior, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery at a single lumbar level with degenerative spinal disease. World Neurosurg. 2017;101:216–226. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.114

5. Kim JS, Choi WG, Lee SH. Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis: minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine J. 2010;10:404–409. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.022

6. Manzur M, Virk SS, Jivanelli B, Vaishnav AS, McAnany SJ, Albert TJ, Iyer S, Gang CH, Qureshi S. The rate of fusion for stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review. Spine J. 2019;19:1294–1301. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.03.001

7. Круглов И.А., Гизатуллин Ш.Х., Селезнев А.С., Вовкогон В.Б. Опыт хирургического лечения грыж межпозвонковых дисков поясничного отдела позвоночника. В кн.: Труды Главного военного клинического госпиталя им. Н.Н. Бурденко. Т. 9, Ч. 1. Москва, 2012. С. 71–74. [Kruglov IA, Gizatullin ShKh, Seleznev AS, Vovkogon VB. Experience in surgical treatment of herniated intervertebral discs of the lumbar spine. In: Proceedings of the Main Military Clinical Hospital n. a. N.N. Burdenko. Vol. 9, Part 1. Moscow, 2012. P. 71–74]. EDN: LUHJWK

8. Abe K, Orita S, Mannoji C, Motegi H, Aramomi M, Ishikawa T, Kotani T, Akazawa T, Morinaga T, Fujiyoshi T, Hasue F, Yamagata M, Hashimoto M, Yamauchi T, Eguchi Y, Suzuki M, Hanaoka E, Inage K, Sato J, Fujimoto K, Shiga Y, Kanamoto H, Yamauchi K, Nakamura J, Suzuki T, Hynes RA, Aoki Y, Takahashi K, Ohtori S. Perioperative complications in 155 patients who underwent oblique lateral interbody fusion surgery: perspectives and indications from a retrospective multicenter survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42:55–62. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001650

9. Razzouk J, Cheng D, Carter D, Mehta S, Ramos O, Cheng W. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with anterior plate fixation. Cureus. 2024;16:e55139. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55139

10. Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Thayaparan GK, Rao PJ. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion as a salvage technique for pseudarthrosis following posterior lumbar fusion surgery. Global Spine J. 2015;6:14–20. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1555656

11. Brantigan JW, Steffee AD. A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18:2106–2107. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199310001-00030

12. Sanghvi PA, Wiener JM, Meade SM, Boden LM, Shost MD, Steinmetz MP. Development of a unified and comprehensive definition of successful spinal fusion: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2025;42:403–412. DOI: 10.3171/2024.9.SPINE2465

13. Dubousset J. Three-dimensional analysis of the scoliotic deformity. In: Weinstein SL, ed. The Pediatric Spine: Principles and Practice. New York: Raven Press Ltd, 1994:479–496.

14. Le Huec JC, Hasegawa K. Normative values for the spine shape parameters using 3D standing analysis from a database of 268 asymptomatic Caucasian and Japanese subjects. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:3630–3637. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4485-5

15. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:346–353. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000152379.54463.65

16. Гизатуллин Ш.Х., Сычев В. А., Круглов И.А. Анализ тактики хирургического лечения дегенеративных заболеваний поясничного отдела позвоночника, осложненных нестабильностью позвоночно-двигательного сегмента. Медицинский вестник ГВКГ им. Н.Н. Бурденко. 2013;10:93–95. [Gizatullin ShKh, Sychev VA, Kruglov IA. Analysis of the tactics of surgical treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine complicated by instability of the spinal motion segment. Medical Bulletin of the Main Military Clinical Hospital n.a. N.N. Burdenko. 2013;10:93–95]. EDN: CEMKGW

17. Gizatullin ShKh, Kurnosenko V, Kristosturov A, Dubinin I. Multilevel anterior lumbar disc replacement: sagittal balance correction. Global Spine J. 2019;9 Suppl 2:312S.

18. Phan K, Thayaparan GK, Mobbs RJ. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion – systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Neurosurg. 2015;29:705–711. DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2015.1036838

19. Rao PJ, Loganathan A, Yeung V, Mobbs RJ. Outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery based on indication: a prospective study. Neurosurgery. 2015;76:7–23; discussion 23–24. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000561

20. Allain J, Dufour T. Anterior lumbar fusion techniques: ALIF, OLIF, DLIF, LLIF, IXLIF. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020;106(1S):S149–S157. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.05.024

21. Moses ZB, Razvi S, Oh SY, Platt A, Keegan KC, Hamati F, Witiw C, David BT, Fontes RBV, Deutsch H, O’Toole JE, Fessler RG. A retrospective comparison of radiographic and clinical outcomes in single-level degenerative lumbar disease undergoing anterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Spine Surg. 2021;7:170–180. DOI: 10.21037/jss-20-673

22. Platz U, Halm H, Thomsen B, Pecsi F, Köszegvary M, Bürger N, Berlin C, Quante M. Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) for fusion surgery in L5/S1 - What is the best way to restore a physiological alignment? Z Orthop Unfall. 2022;160:646–656. DOI: 10.1055/a-1560-3106

23. Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg. 2015;1:2–18. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05

24. Mobbs RJ, Loganathan A, Yeung V, Rao PJ. Indications for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Surg. 2013;5:153–163. DOI: 10.1111/os.12048

25. Gizatullin ShKh, Kurnosenko V, Dubinin I, Bitner S, Kazakov S. Diagnostic and surgery for lumbar spine degenerative disease in osteoporotic patients. Global Spine J. 2019;9 Suppl 2:315S.

26. Mayer HM, Heider F. “Slalom”: microsurgical cross-over decompression for multilevel degenerative lumbar stenosis. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:9074257. DOI: 10.1155/2016/9074257

27. Колотов Е.Б., Аминов Р.Р., Колотова Е.В., Кельмаков В.В. Применение вентральных декомпрессивно-стабилизирующих вмешательств у больных с корешковым компрессионным синдромом на поясничном уровне при сочетании спондилоартроза и грыжи диска. Нейрохирургия. 2013;(4):46–52. [Kolotov EB, Aminov RR, Kolotova EV, Kel’makov VV. The usage of ventral decompressive-stabilizing operations at patients with lumbar radicular compressive syndrome because of combination of spondylarthrosis and diskal hernia. Russian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2013;(4):46–52]. DOI: 10.17650/1683-3295-2013-0-4-46-52 EDN: SDUUUN

28. Formica M, Vallerga D, Zanirato A, Cavagnaro L, Basso M, Divano S, Mosconi L, Quarto E, Siri G. Fusion rate and influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Musculoskelet Surg. 2020;104:1–15. DOI: 10.1007/s12306-019-00634-x

29. Peng CH, Chen IH, Yu TC, Wang JH, Wu WT, Yeh KT. Risk factors for reoperation after discectomy of lumbar herniated intervertebral disc disease. Tzu Chi Med J. 2024;36:298–303. DOI: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_206_23

30. Tsalimas G, Galanis A, Vavourakis M, Sakellariou E, Zachariou D, Varsamos I, Patilas C, Kolovos I, Marougklianis V, Karampinas P, Kaspiris A, Pneumaticos S. Vascular injuries and complications in anterior lumbar interbody fusion: an up-to-date review. J Med Life. 2025;18:165–170. DOI: 10.25122/jml-2024-0345

31. Patel NA, Kuo CC, Pennington Z, Brown NJ, Gendreau J, Singh R, Shahrestani S, Boyett C, Diaz-Aguilar LD, Pham MH. Robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement accuracy compared with alternative guidance in lateral single-position surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2023;39:443–451. DOI: 10.3171/2023.3.SPINE2329


Review

For citations:


Gizatullin Sh.Kh., Pestov N.A., Lysenko I.S., Kurnosenko V.Yu., Dubinin I.P., Sampiev M.T. Comparative analysis of ALIF and TLIF in recurrent L5–S1 intervertebral disc disease. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2026;23(1):56-62. https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2026.1.56-62



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1810-8997 (Print)
ISSN 2313-1497 (Online)