RESULT OF COMPREHENSIVE SURGICAL TREATMENT OF A PATIENT WITH CAUDAL REGRESSION SYNDROME
https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2014.4.106-111
Abstract
The paper presents the completed case of comprehensive staged surgical treatment of a patient with caudal regression syndrome combined with multiple malformations performed in Novosibirsk RITO in 2010-2012. Evaluation of the child’s condition was performed using clinical and radiological methods. Results of the treatment for rare severe malformation of the spine combined with multiple developmental musculoskeletal defects are demonstrated, and the opportunities of reconstructive surgery in the treatment of multiple defects of musculoskeletal system are presented.
About the Authors
Aleksandr Leonidovich Semyonov
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitry Vladimirovich Ryzhikov
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mikhail Vitalyevich Mikhailovsky
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksandr Sergeyevich Vasyura
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Виссарионов С.В., Казарян И.В., Белянчиков С.М. Лечение пациентов с синдромом каудальной регрессии // Хирургия позвоночника. 2011. № 3. С. 56-59. [Vissarionov SV, Kazaryan IV, Belyanchikov SM. Treatment of patients with caudal regression syndrome. Hir pozvonoc. 2011; (3): 56-59. In Russian].
2. Виссарионов С.В., Казарян И.В. Синдром каудальной регрессии // Хирургия позвоночника. 2010. № 2. С. 50-55. [Vissarionov SV, Kazaryan IV. Caudal regression syndrome. Hir Pozvonoc. 2010; (2): 50-55. In Russian].
3. Патент № 2445033 Российская Федерация. Способ лечения сакральной агенезии / Новиков В.В., Васюра А.С., Михайловский М.В.; заявл. 21.04.2010; опубл. 20.03.2012, Бюл. № 8. [Novikov VV, Vasyura AS, Mikhailovsky MV. Method of surgical treatment of sacral agenesis. Patent RU 2445033; appl. 13.09.2010; publ. 20.03.2012, Bull. 8. In Russian].
4. Adra, A, Cordero D, Mejides A, et al. Caudal regression syndrome: etiopathogenesis, prenatal diagnosis, and perinatal management. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1994; 49: 508-516.
5. Al Kaissi A, Klaushofer K, Grill F. Caudal regression syndrome and popliteal webbing in connection with maternal diabetes mellitus: a case report and literature review. Cases J. 2008;1:407. doi: 10.1186/1757-1626-1-407.
6. Banta JV, Nichols O. Sacral agenesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969; 51: 693-703.
7. Begum S, Shelim R, Begum T, et al. Caudal regression syndrome - a case report and literature review. J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg. 2011; 29: 166-169.
8. Cama A, Palmieri A, Capra V, et al. Multidisciplinary management of caudal regression syndrome (26 cases). Eur J Ped Surg. 1996; 6. Suppl 1: 44-45.
9. Chen CP, Chen CY, Lin CY, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of concomitant alobar holoprosencephaly and caudal regression syndrome associated with maternal diabetes. Prenat Diagn. 2005; 25: 264-266.
10. De Marco P, Merello E, Mascelli S, et al. Mutational screening of the CYP26A1 gene in patients with caudal regression syndrome. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2006; 76: 86-95.
11. Diel J, Ortiz O, Losada RA, et al. The sacrum: pathologic spectrum, multimodality imaging, and subspecialty approach. Radiographics. 2001; 21: 83-104.
12. Duczkowska A, Bekiesinska-Figatowska M, Herman-Sucharska I, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the fetal spinal canal contents. Brain Dev. 2011; 33: 10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2010.01.003.
13. Garcia-Barcelo MM, Wong KK, Lui VC, et al. Identification of a HOXD13 mutation in a VACTERL patient. Am J Med Genet A. 2008; 146A: 3181-3185. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32426.
14. Goto MP, Goldman AS. Diabetic embryopathy. Curr Opin Pediatr.1994; 6: 486-491.
15. Guille JT, Benevides R, DeAlba CC, et al. Lumbosacral agenesis: a new classification correlating spinal deformity and ambulatory potential. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84-A: 32-38.
16. Hay WW Jr. Care of the infant of the diabetic mother. Curr Diab Rep. 2012; 12: 4-15. doi: 10.1007/s11892-011-0243-6.
17. Herrmann J, Brauer M, Scheer I, et al. Extrahepatic biliary atresia and caudal regression syndrome in an infant of a diabetic mother. J Pediatr Surg. 2004; 39: E20-E22.
18. Lete J, Granese R, Jeanty P, et al. Fetal syndromes. In: P.W.Callen, ed. Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 5th edition. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier, 2008: 112-180.
19. Mihmanli I, Kurugoglu S, Kantarci F, et al. Dorsolumbosacral agenesis. Pediatr Radiol. 2001; 31: 286-288.
20. Nievelstein RA, Valk J, Smit LM, et al. MR of the caudal regression syndrome: embryologic implications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994; 15: 1021-1029.
21. Reece EA, Hobbins JC. Diabetic embryopathy: pathogenesis, prenatal diagnosis and prevention. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1986; 41: 325-335.
22. Renshaw TS. Sacral Agenesis. In: The Pediatric Spine - Principles and Practice. Raven Press, New York, 1994; 1: 2214.
23. Renshaw TS. Sacral agenesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978; 60: 373-383.
24. Rojansky N, Fasouliotis SJ, Ariel I, et al. Extreme caudal agenesis. Possible drug-related etiology? J Reprod Med. 2002; 47: 241-245.
25. Semba К, Yamamura K. Etiology of caudal regression syndrome. Human Genet Embryol. 2013; 3: 107. doi: 10.4172/2161-0436.1000107.
26. Sendhil CA, Sunitha VC, Vasavi K, et al. Caudal regression syndrome: a rare case report. Int J Res Med Sci. 2014; 2: 344-346. doi: 10.5455/2320-6012.ijrms20140268.
27. Singh SK, Singh RD, Sharma A. Caudal regression syndrome - case report and review of literature. Pediatr Surg Int. 2005; 21: 578-581.
28. Stewart JM, Stoll S. Familial caudal regression anomalad and maternal diabetes. J Med Genet. 1979; 16: 17-20.
29. Temizkan O, Abike F, Ayvacı H, et al. Prenatal diagnosed caudal regression syndrome. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013; 3: 227-231. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2013.32042.
30. Unsinn KM, Geley T, Freund MC, et al. US of the spinal cord in newborns: spectrum of normal findings, variants, congenital anomalies, and acquired diseases. Radiographics. 2000; 20: 923-938.
31. Valenzano M, Paoletti R, Rossi A, et al. Sirenomelia. Pathological features, antenatal ultrasonographic clues, and a review of current embryogenic theories. Hum Reprod Update. 1999; 5: 82-86.
32. Versiani BR, Gilbert-Barness E, Giuliani LR, et al. Caudal dysplasia sequence: severe phenotype presenting in offspring of patients with gestational and pregestational diabetes. Clin Dysmorphol. 2004; 13: 1-5.
33. Welch JP, Aterman K. The syndrome of caudal dysplasia: a review, including etiologic considerations and evidence of heterogeneity. Pediatr Pathol. 1984; 2, 313-327.
Review
For citations:
Semyonov A.L., Ryzhikov D.V., Mikhailovsky M.V., Vasyura A.S. RESULT OF COMPREHENSIVE SURGICAL TREATMENT OF A PATIENT WITH CAUDAL REGRESSION SYNDROME. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2014;(4):106-111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2014.4.106-111
Email this article 