ROBOTIC MECHANOTHERAPY IN STAGED REHABILITATION OF PATIENTS WITH CONSEQUENCES OF SPINAL CORD INJURY
https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2017.1.46-50
Abstract
Objective. To analyze the outcomes of early rehabilitation of patients with consequences of spinal cord injury using robotic technology.
Material and Methods. A total of 122 patients with consequences of spinal cord injury having movement disorders were examined and treated in the rehabilitation department of the Novosibirsk RITO. Group 1 included 59 patients treated with the standard version of rehabilitation program, while the program used in Group 2 (63 patients) involved longer and more careful preparation for sessions on the Lokomat machine and consisted of three stages of treatment - prehospital, preliminary and main ones.
Results. The course of rehabilitation therapy had positive effect on the dynamics of neurological symptoms. Indicators of positive dynamics were statistically significantly higher in patients of Group 2. Data of electrophysiological study also showed that the optimized treatment program was more effective in restoring lost functions of the spinal cord. Optimization of rehabilitation and preconditioning of patients to loads decreased frequency of adverse reactions (orthostatic and fever responses, increase in pyramidal muscle tone in lower extremities) in comparison with the standard approach.
Conclusion. Optimized course of rehabilitation therapy positively affected the dynamics of neurological symptoms.
About the Authors
Yulia Vladimirovna PolilovaRussian Federation
Viktor Anatolyevich Drobyshev
Russian Federation
Vyacheslav Vladimirovich Stupak
Russian Federation
Oksana Viktorovna Shelyakina
Russian Federation
Sergey Borisovich Tsvetovsky
Russian Federation
Elena Vladimirovna Chesheva
Russian Federation
Ekaterina Vladimirovna Mamonova
Russian Federation
References
1. Белова А.Н. Нейрореабилитация: Руководство для врачей. М., 2000.
2. Даминов В.Д., Кучеренко С.С., Сагильдина Ю.О., Кузнецов А.Н. Роботизированные технологии в реабилитации больных после хирургической реваскуляризации мозга // Вестник восстановительной медицины. 2012. № 2 (48). С. 29-31.
3. Зенков Л.Р., Ронкин М.А. Функциональная диагностика нервных болезней. М., 2004.
4. Канкулова Е.А., Даминов В.Д., Зимина Е.В., Кузнецов А.Н. Транскраниальная церебральная электростимуляция в сочетании с роботизированной механотерапией // Доктор.Ру. 2010. № 8 (59). С. 48-50.
5. Карепов Г.В., Горбунов В.И., Карепова И.Д. Динамика вегетативных реакций у больных травматической болезнью спинного мозга в процессе бальнеогрязелечения // Курортология и физиотерапия. Киев, 2007. Вып. 20. С. 23-26.
6. Леонтьев М.А. Хирургическая коррекция патологии стопы в комплексе двигательной реабилитации у пациентов с нижней параплегией: Автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. Новокузнецк, 2003.
Review
For citations:
Polilova Yu.V., Drobyshev V.A., Stupak V.V., Shelyakina O.V., Tsvetovsky S.B., Chesheva E.V., Mamonova E.V. ROBOTIC MECHANOTHERAPY IN STAGED REHABILITATION OF PATIENTS WITH CONSEQUENCES OF SPINAL CORD INJURY. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2017;14(1):46-50. https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2017.1.46-50