Preview

Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika)

Advanced search

Comparison of Conservative Therapy and Surgical Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Uncomplicated AOSpine Type A3 Fractures at the Thoracolumbar Junction

https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2026.2.37-47

Abstract

Objective. To perform comparative analysis of long-term clinical and radiological results of conservative therapy and surgical treatment of patients with uncomplicated fractures of the AOSpine type A3 vertebrae in the thoracolumbar junction.

Material and Methods. The research is a prospective comparative non-inferiority study with historical control. The inclusion criteria were patient age over 18 years, acute or subacute injury, uncomplicated AOSpine type A3 fracture at the T10–L2 level, and spinal canal stenosis of less than 50%. The conservative therapy group (CoT) received fracture immobilization with a rigid frame brace, followed by a two-phase rehabilitation course starting on the first or second day after diagnosis. The surgical treatment group (ST; n = 23) included patients who underwent anterior fusion or transpedicular fixation without decompression. The CoT group was followed for 12 months. The primary endpoint was the quality of life according to the Oswestry scale (ODI), secondary endpoints were the level of pain according to the VAS, the dynamics of the Cobb angle, spinal stenosis, as well as degenerative changes in the facet joints and intervertebral discs.

Results. Patients in the CoT group were on average 10 years older than those in the ST group upon admission (p = 0.049); other demographic and radiographic parameters did not differ significantly between the groups. At the follow-up, the median VAS pain scores in the CoT and ST groups were 0 and 2 points, (p < 0.001) and the ODI value was 4 and 12 (p < 0.001), respectively. The ST group demonstrated a smaller increase in the Cobb angle compared to the CoT group (0.7° and 4.9°, respectively) due to surgical correction of kyphosis and its maintenance using metal implants, as well as a twofold greater restoration of the spinal canal lumen (t-test; p = 0.007). However, the final spinal stenosis indices did not differ significantly between the groups. Ankylosis of the facet joints and intervertebral discs, both at the level of injury and in adjacent segments, was significantly more frequent after surgical treatment (χ2 test; p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Fracture union as a result of treatment was detected in 91.3% of patients in the ST group and in 88.2% in the CoT group (χ2 test; p = 0.193).

Conclusion. Long-term treatment outcomes of uncomplicated AOSpine type A3 fractures at the thoracolumbar junction demonstrate that conservative therapy is comparable to surgical treatment for kyphotic deformity less than 14.9°, relative anterior vertebral body height greater than 51.8%, vertebral body index greater than 0.54, and spinal stenosis less than 43.9%. Rehabilitation should begin within 24 hours of diagnosis and continue in a rehabilitation center. Surgical treatment allows for better correction of kyphotic deformity and spinal canal stenosis, but it also promotes degenerative changes both in the fractured vertebra and in adjacent segments. The final decision regarding the choice of treatment method (surgical or conservative) should be made in consultation with the patient, taking into account the comparable clinical outcome, the need for deformity correction and the likelihood of complications.

About the Authors

A. A. Grin
N.V. Sklifosovsky Scientific Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Andrey Anatolyevich Grin, MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)



A. E. Talypov
N.V. Sklifosovsky Scientific Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Aleksandr Ernestovich Talypov, MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)



A. Yu. Kordonskiy
N.V. Sklifosovsky Scientific Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Anton Yuryevich Kordonskiy, MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)



V. A. Karanadze
N.V. Sklifosovsky Scientific Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Vasily Amiranovich Karanadze, MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)



I. S. Lvov
N.V. Sklifosovsky Scientific Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Ivan Sergeyevich Lvov, MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)



R. I. Abdrafiev
N.V. Sklifosovsky Scientific Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Rinat Irfanovich Abdrafiev; 3 Bolshaya Sukharevskaya sq., Moscow, 129090, Russia



I. V. Pogonchenkova
Moscow Research and Practical Center for Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Irena Vladimirovna Pogonchenkova, MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor



E. V. Kostenko
Moscow Research and Practical Center for Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Elena Vladimirovna Kostenko, MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor



M. R. Makarova
Moscow Research and Practical Center for Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Marina Rostislavovna Makarova, MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)



A. V. Leonov
Moscow Research and Practical Center for Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation

Aleksey Vladimirovich Leonov



References

1. Фарйон А.О., Паськов Р.В., Сергеев К.С., Базаров А.Ю., Прокопьев А.Н., Дадашев С.И. Анализ эпидемиологических показателей, госпитального лечения, характера и вида повреждений позвоночника у взрослых пациентов, проходивших лечение в травматологическом центре I уровня. Вестник травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова. 2025;32(1):61–70. [Farion AO, Paskov RV, Sergeev KS, Bazarov AY, Prokopev AN, Dadashev SI. Analysis of epidemiological indicators, hospital treatment, the nature and type of spinal injuries in adult patients treated at a level I trauma center. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 2025;32(1):61–70]. DOI: 10.17816/vto629457 EDN: ASDDQV

2. Морозов И.Н., Млявых С.Г. Эпидемиология позвоночно-спинномозговой травмы (обзор). Медицинский альманах. 2011;(4):157–159. [Morozov IN, Mlyavykh SG. Epidemiology of spinal cord injury (review). Medical Almanac. 2011;(4):157–159]. EDN: NUJLSD

3. Гринь А.А., Талыпов А.Э., Кордонский А.Ю., Каранадзе В.А., Львов И.С., Cмирнов В.А., Абдрафиев Р.И. Эффективность и безопасность короткой транспедикулярной фиксации при неосложненных взрывных переломах нижнегрудного и поясничного отделов позвоночника: метаанализ исследований, опубликованных за последние 20 лет. Хирургия позвоночника. 2024;21(3):14–24. [Grin AA, Talypov AE, Kordonskiy AYu, Karanadze VA, Lvov IS, Smirnov VA, Abdrafiev RI. Efficacy and safety of short segment pedicle screw fixation in patients with neurologically intact burst fractures of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine: a meta-analysis of studies published over the last 20 years. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2024;21(3):14–24]. DOI: 10.14531/ss2024.3.14-24 EDN: RBBLQI

4. Rometsch E, Spruit M, Härtl R, McGuire RA, Gallo-Kopf BS, Kalampoki V, Kandziora F. Does operative or nonoperative treatment achieve better results in A3 and A4 spinal fractures without neurological deficit? Systematic literature review with meta-analysis. Global Spine J. 2017;7:350–372. DOI: 10.1177/2192568217699202

5. Гринь А.В., Талыпов А.Э., Каранадзе В.А., Кордонский А.Ю., Абдрафи-ев Р.И. Дегенеративные изменения в позвоночно-двигательном сегменте после хирургического лечения переломов грудного и поясничного отделов позвоночника. Российский нейрохирургический журнал имени профессора А.Л. Поленова. 2025;17(3):43–53. [Grin AA, Talipov AE, Karanadze VA, Kordonsky AYu, Abdrafiev RI. Degenerative changes in the spinal motion segment following surgical treatment of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. Russian neurosurgical journal named after professor A.L. Polenov. 2025;XVII(3):43–53]. DOI: 10.56618/2071-2693_2025_17_3_43 EDN: JSSNFY

6. Гринь А.А., Каранадзе В.А., Кордонский А.Ю., Талыпов А.Э., Львов И.С., Абдрафиев Р.И. Эффективность и безопасность консервативной терапии у пациентов со взрывными неосложненными переломами грудного и поясничного отделов позвоночника: метаанализ. Хирургия позвоночника. 2024;21(2):27–38. [Grin AA, Karanadze VA, Kordonskiy AYu, Talypov AE, Lvov IS, Abdrafiev RI. Efficacy and safety of conservative treatment in patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures: a meta-analysis. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2024;21(2):27–38]. DOI: 10.14531/ss2024.2.27-38 EDN: NGRFQW

7. Liu GKP, Das K. Video assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spinal conditions. Neurol India. 2005;53:480–485. DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.22619

8. Черепанов Е.А. Русская версия опросника Освестри: культурная адаптация и валидность. Хирургия позвоночника. 2009;(3):93–98. [Cherepanov E.A. Russian version of the Oswestry Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation and validity. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2009;(3):93–98]. DOI: 10.14531/ss2009.3.93-98 EDN: KXDEMR

9. Pathria M, Sartoris DJ, Resnick D. Osteoarthritis of the facet joints: accuracy of oblique radiographic assessment. Radiology. 1987;164:227–230. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.164.1.3588910

10. Brantigan JW, Steffee AD. A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18:2106–2107. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199310001-00030

11. Lee YP, Sclafani J, Garfin SR. Lumbar pseudarthrosis: diagnosis and treatment. Semin Spine Surg. 2011;23:275–281. DOI: 10.1053/j.semss.2011.05.009

12. Hung M, Saltzman CL, Kendall R, Bounsanga J, Voss MW, Lawrence B, Spiker R, Brodke D. What are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI instruments among patients with spinal conditions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476:2027–2036. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000419

13. RiskCalc Sample Size Calculator. Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute; 2016–2025. [Electronoc resource]. URL: https://riskcalc.org/samplesize (дата обращения: 14.09.2023). [RiskCalc Sample Size Calculator. Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute; 2016–2025.[Electronoc resource]. URL: https://riskcalc.org/samplesize. Accessed date 14/09/2023].

14. Перелом (вывих) грудного и пояснично-крестцового отдела позвоночника. Клинические рекомендации / Ассоциация нейрохирургов России, Ассоциация травматологов и ортопедов России, Ассоциация хирургов-вертебрологов, Союз реабилитологов России. Утв. 2024. URL: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/preview-cr/448_4 [Fracture (dislocation) of the thoracic and lumbosacral spine. Clinical guidelines / Association of Neurosurgeons of Russia, Association of Traumatologists and Orthopedists of Russia, Association of Spine Surgeons, Union of Rehabilitation Specialists of Russia. Approved 2024. URL: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/preview-cr/448_4].

15. Перелом (вывих) грудного и поясничного отделов позвоночника. Клинические рекомендации. Утверждены Минздравом РФ. Москва, 2023. [Fractures (dislocations) of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Clinical guidelines. Approved by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Moscow, 2023]. URL: https://disuria.ru/_ld/12/1274_kr21S22S23S32MZ.pdf.

16. Peev N, Zileli M, Sharif S, Arif S, Brady Z. Indications for nonsurgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations. Neurospine. 2021;18:713–724. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2142390.195

17. Rabb CH, Hoh DJ, Anderson PA, Arnold PM, Chi JH, Dailey AT, Dhall SS, Eichholz KM, Harrop JS, Qureshi S, Raksin PB, Kaiser MG, O’Toole JE. Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma: operative versus nonoperative treatment. Neurosurgery. 2019;84:E50–E52. DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy361

18. Shen WJ, Liu TJ, Shen YS. Nonoperative treatment versus posterior fixation for thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficit. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:1038–1045. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200105010-00010

19. Wood K, Buttermann G, Mehbod A, Garvey T, Jhanjee R, Sechriest V. Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:773–781. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200305000-00001

20. Siebenga J, Leferink VJ, Segers MJ, Elzinga MJ, Bakker FC, Haarman HJ, Rommens PM, ten Duis HJ, Patka P. Treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures: a multicenter prospective randomized study of operative versus nonsurgical treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:2881–2890. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000247804.91869.1e

21. Post RB, van der Sluis CK, Leferink VJ, ten Duis HJ. Long-term functional outcome after type A3 spinal fractures: operative versus non-operative treatment. Acta Orthop Belg. 2009;75:389–395.

22. Landi A, Marotta N, Mancarella C, Meluzio MC, Pietrantonio A, Delfini R. Percutaneous short fixation vs conservative treatment: comparative analysis of clinical and radiological outcome for A.3 burst fractures of thoraco-lumbar junction and lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2014;23 Suppl 6:671–676. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3554-x

23. Mohamadi A, Googanian A, Ahmadi A, Kamali A. Comparison of surgical or nonsurgical treatment outcomes in patients with thoracolumbar fracture with Score 4 of TLICS: A randomized, single-blind, and single-central clinical trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e9842. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009842

24. Pehlivanoglu T, Akgul T, Bayram S, Meric E, Ozdemir M, Korkmaz M, Sar C. Conservative versus operative treatment of stable thoracolumbar burst fractures in neurologically intact patients: is there any difference regarding the clinical and radiographic outcomes? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45:452–458. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003295

25. Gonzales-Portillo GS, Mamaril-Davis JC, Riordan K, Avila MJ, Aguilar-Salinas P, Burket A, Dumont T. Evaluation of the thoracolumbar injury classification and severity (TLICS) score over a two-year period at a level one trauma center. Cureus. 2023;15:e43762. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43762

26. Wang T, Wang Z, Ji P, Zhang J, Zhang C, Zhang L. The efficacy and safety of anterior versus posterior approach for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Transl Med. 2022;10:309. DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-903

27. Grin A, Karanadze V, Lvov I, Kordonskiy A, Talypov A, Smirnov V, Zakharov P. Effective method of pedicle screw fixation in patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review of studies published over the last 20 years. Neurocirugia (Engl Ed). 2024;35:299–310. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucie.2024.07.009


Review

For citations:


Grin A.A., Talypov A.E., Kordonskiy A.Yu., Karanadze V.A., Lvov I.S., Abdrafiev R.I., Pogonchenkova I.V., Kostenko E.V., Makarova M.R., Leonov A.V. Comparison of Conservative Therapy and Surgical Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Uncomplicated AOSpine Type A3 Fractures at the Thoracolumbar Junction. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika). 2026;23(2):37-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2026.2.37-47



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1810-8997 (Print)
ISSN 2313-1497 (Online)