SURGICAL TREATMENT
To correct and stabilize spinal segments in scoliosis the external fixators are used at the Department of Neurosurgery, Russian Ilizarov Scientific Centre for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics.
Surgery was performed at several stages. At the first stage a costal humpback was resected; at the second stage transpedicular insertion of half-pins above and below the apex of the curvature arch, the fixator assembling and deformity correction were performed. At the third stage the achieved correction was stabilized. Stabilization of countercurvature arch was carried out at stage IV. The fixator was removed when a bone or bone-fibrous block was formed.
Discotomy of one or two discs at the scoliotic arc apex was performed through posterior approach in 43 patients. Out of them in 17 patients autografts were inserted bilaterally into the disc space. Posterior spinal fusion with autoribs was performed in 9 patients; anterior fusion with autobone - in 6 patients, with homobone - in 11 and with porous nickeltitanium - in 53 patients. The mean period of treatment with the fixator was 6 months, including 2.5 months of prolonged deformity correction, and 3.5 months of fixation. To support the obtained correction after fixator removal the patients used a brace for 6-12 months.
Use of the external transpedicular fixator allows maximum possible correction of spine deformity, prevention of neurologic and vascular complications related to one-stage correction, and to create optimal conditions for spine reorganization maintaining its mobility after the deformity correction. For effective deformity correction without any neurologic consequences in case of III-IV degree scoliosis we consider expedient the formation of anterior "wedging" body fusion on the concave side of the curvature apex. The results obtained suggest that the use of the porous nickel-titanium implants for anterior spinal fusion has given the possibility to decrease the risk of postoperative deformity progression at the expense of the implant mechanical strength, and to reduce the period of treatment due to their high adaptive properties.
Study Design. A clinical retrospective study was conducted.
Objective. To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcome of anterior and posterior instrumental correction for lumbar and thoracolumbar scoliosis.
Methods. Thirty-three patients who underwent anterior and/or posterior surgical reconstruction for thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis were included in this study. Out of them there were 14 adolescents (range, 14-16 years) and 19 - adults (range, 32-62 years). In 7 adolescents correction was performed with CDI, and in 7 - with anterior Hopf instrumentation. In adult patients only posterior instrumentation (CDI) was used. Seven patients underwent only correction and posterior spinal fusion. In 10 cases with clinical and radiological signs of spinal stenosis multilevel decompression and posterior instrumentation were performed and out of them 5 cases were followed by additional interbody fusion with Interfix cages.
Results. The correction of deformity in adolescents treated with anterior or posterior instrumentation ranged from 40 % to 90 %. In patients with anterior instrumentation correction of the total curve and central angles was insignificantly higher. In adult patients clinical improvement with pain relief was achieved in all cases. Radiographic investigations demonstrated improvement with partial correction of deformity and fusion.
Conclusions. Both anterior and posterior instrumentations are effective techniques for the management of lumbar and thoracolumbar scoliosis in adolescents. In adult patients with lumbar and thoracolumbar scoliosis the goal of surgical treatment is first of all clinical and neurological improvement, which can be achieved by spinal decompression followed by posterior instrumentation.
Objective. To develop algorithm for planning of surgical intervention in patients with progressing congenital scoliosis.
Materials and methods. The results of surgical treatment of 35 patients with various modifications of Cotrel - Dubousset instrumentation (CDI) were studied. Out of them 29 patients were women and 6 - men. The age varied from 5 to 39 years (М = 15,4 years). All patients were divided in two groups. In the first group (n = 25) the algorithm of planning depending on apex localization of a blocking basic arch in the curve, and also on inclusion in the block of its mobile and rigid levels adjacent to basic arch was used. Five subgroups of deformity localization were differentiated: upper thoracic, thoracic, thoracolumbar, lumbar and lumbosacral, according to which 5 algorithmic block diagrams were offered. In the second group (n=10) the offered algorithm was not used. Follow-up terms were from half a year to three years.
Results. Use of the offered algorithm in the patients of the first group allowed achieving good results. The absence of algorithmic planning in the second group resulted in unsatisfactory results (deformity progression, trunk misbalance) in many patients.
Conclusions. Use of an offered method provides precise determination of the spinal fusion extent of the basic and compensating arches, permitting to reduce the number of cases of deformity postoperative progression and trunk decompensation development, and thus the necessity of reoperations.
CASE REPORT
REHABILITATION AND QUALITY OF LIFE
Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine influence of various factors on an estimation of surgery outcomes with a Russian version of Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument-24 (SRS-24).
Materials and methods. Questionnaire SRS-24 has been developed for patient self-assessment of outcome after scoliosis surgical correction. It includes 24 questions in 7 domains. Each of 100 patients, which underwent surgery answered the questionnaires at controlled follow-up (232 questionnaires).
Results: Regarding pain and a level of professional activity, boys demonstrated the best parameters, and regarding function after operation, satisfaction by results and the consent to operation, the girls did. Patients with congenital deformations demonstrated the best parameters at an estimation of pain and a level of the general activity, and patients with idiopathic scoliosis - at an estimation of appearance and function after operation. CDI application provided the best parameters at an estimation of pain syndrome, function after operation, the general and professional activity, and Drummond technique - at an estimation of result satisfaction and the consent to operation.
Conclusion. Questionnaire SRS-24 is an attempt to estimate surgery outcomes in patients with scoliosis taking into account patient satisfaction. The questionnaire is simple in filling, does not demand additional financial expenses, and is convenient for interpretation.
ANESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICAL RESEARCHES
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES
ORGANIZATION OF THE VERTELBROLOGICAL SERVICE
REVIEW OF PUBLICATIONS
JUBILEE
PATENTS
INFORMATION
ISSN 2313-1497 (Online)